Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Boundary spanners: A key component for the effective interactions of the justice and mental health systems

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Rarely are issues at the interface of the justice and mental health systems framed in system terms. Just how useful this perspective can be is demonstrated by the concept ofboundary spanners. This term has been in the organizational literature for 20 years to define positions that link two or more systems whose goals and expectations are at least partially conflicting. Boundary spanning positions are illustrated here by examples from a jail diversion program in Multnomah County Jail (Portland, Oregon), a community forensic program in Palm Beach County (Florida), and the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board which monitors persons acquitted by reason of insanity. To date, almost no research on boundary spanning positions in criminal justice-mental health system interactions has been conducted. This article concludes that a vigorous pursuit of such an agenda should be initiated because this concept, as part of a systems approach to justice-mental health problems, is highly promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram, K. M. (1990). The problem of co-occuring disorders among jail detainees: Antisocial disorder, drug abuse, and depression.Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1971). Organizational boundaries and interorganizational conflict.Human Relations, 24, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure.Academy of Management Review, 2, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. D., Rogers, J. L., & Manson, S. M. (1982). After Oregon's insanity defense: A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 391–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. D., Williams, M. H., Godard, S. L., & Faulkner, L. R. (1988). The influence of the right to refuse treatment on precommitment patients.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16(1), 5–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Trial Court Performance Standards (1990). Trial court performance standards with commentary. National Center for State Courts and the Bureau of Justice Assistance, United States Department of Justice.

  • Dinges, N. G., & Maynard, W. S. (1983). Intercultural Aspects of Organizational Effectiveness. In D. Landis & R. W. Brislin (Eds.),Handbook of intercultural training, Volume II: Issues in training methodology (pp. 50–81). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvoskin, J. A. (1989). The Palm Beach County, Florida, Forensic Mental Health Services Program: A Comprehensive Community-Based System. In H. J. Steadman, D. W. McCarty & J. P. Morrissey (Eds.),The mentally ill in fail: Planning for essential services (pp. 178–197). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, H. R. (1989). Returning the not guilty by reason of insanity to the community: A new scale to determine readiness.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17(4), 401–413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, S. L., Eaves, D., & Kowaz, A. M. (1989). The assessment, treatment and community outcome of insanity acquittees: Forensic history and response to treatment.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 12(2–3), 149–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989a).Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K. S., & McClaren, H. (1988). Assessment of competency for executions? A guide for mental health professionals.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16(3), 205–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keilitz, I., & Roesch, R. (1992). Improving mental health and justice systems interactions: In search of a new paradigm. This issue,Law and Human Behavior, 16, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiersch, T. A. (1990). Treatment of sex offenders with depo-provera.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 18(2), 179–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemelka, R.(1990). The mentally ill in local jails: Issues in admission and booking. In H. J. Steadman (Ed.),Jail diversion for the mentally ill: Breaking through the barriers (pp. 35–63). The National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System.

  • Miles, R. H. (1980). Organizational boundary roles. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.),Current concerns in occupational stress (pp. 65–95). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. D., Bernstein, M. R., Van Rybroek, G. J., & Maier, G. J. (1989). The impact of the right to refuse treatment in a forensic patient population: Six-month review.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17(2), 107–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. D., & Germain, E. J. (1988). The retrospective evaluation of competency to stand trial.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 11(2), 113–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The National Resource Center on Homelessness and Mental Illness. (1990). Case management with homeless mentally ill persons.

  • Peters, R., Miller, K. S., Schmidt, W., & Meeter, D. (1987). The effects of statutory change on the civil commitment of the mentally ill.Law and Human Behavior, 11(2), 73–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, P., Spaniol, L., & Zipple, A. (1986). Cases management services for persons who are homeless and mentally ill: Report from an NIMH Workshop. Boston, MA: Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. K., & Bergman, G. T. (1989). Choices in case management: A review of current knowledge and practice for mental health programs. Policy Resources Inc., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rog, D., Andranovich, G., & Rosenblum, S. (1987). Intensive case management for persons who are homeless and mentally ill: A review of CSP and human resource development program efforts. Washington, DC: COSMOS Corporations, Vols. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. L., & Bloom, J. D. (1982). Characteristics of persons committed to Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10(3), 5–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W. (1990). Status incongruence among boundary spanners: Structure, exchange, and conflict.American Sociological Review, 55(August), 496–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, A. M., & Elwork, A. (1990). Treating incompetence to stand trial.Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., McCarty, D. W., & Morrissey, J. P. (1989).The mentally ill in jail: Planning for essential services. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A. (in press). The criminalizational hypothesis: Myth, misnomer or management strategy. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mentals Health.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Policy Research Associates, Inc., 262 Delaware Avenue, 12054, Delmar, New York

    Henry J. Steadman

Authors
  1. Henry J. Steadman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The incisive comments of Ingo Keilitz and Tom Hafemeister on earlier drafts of this manuscript are gratefully acknowledged.

About this article

Cite this article

Steadman, H.J. Boundary spanners: A key component for the effective interactions of the justice and mental health systems. Law Hum Behav 16, 75–87 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351050

Keywords

Search

Navigation