Skip to main content
Log in

Visual and auditory cues in conspecific discrimination learning in Bengalese finches

  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four Bengalese finches were trained to discriminate 2 conspecific individuals in an operant chamber. Still visual images and contact calls were simultaneously presented to the subjects and specific (“correct”) perching response was reinforced with food. After the birds acquired the discrimination, they received the first test in which visual cues alone, auditory cues alone and combination of the 2 modalities were presented. Visual cues dominantly controlled the discriminative behavior of all birds. Then the subjects received the second test in which mixtures of the visual image of 2 stimulus birds appeared under 3 different auditory conditions, namely, no call, calls of 1 bird and calls of the other bird. Two subjects used the auditory cues when the visual stimulus was a mixture of 2 stimulus birds. These results suggest that the birds used less dominant cues when the dominant cues gave ambiguous information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, S.D. & R.J. Dooling 1992 Perception of conspecific faces by Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Natural faces.J. Comp. Psychol. 106: 203–216.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Candland, D.K. 1969 Discrimination of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social dominance order,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69: 281–285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, T.H. & D.O. Vine 1940 The innate differential in social learning,J. Abn. and Soc. Psychol. 35: 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, J. & D.G. Lander 1971 The pigeons's concept of pigeon.Psychon. Sci. 25: 157–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, G.S. 1961 Attention in the pigeon.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4: 179–184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C.M.E. 1982 Concept formation and individual recognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).Behav. Analysis Let. 2: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillmich, F. 1976 Learning experiments on individual recognition in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Z. Tierpsychol., 41: 372–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S. 1992 Effects of Wulst and ectostriatal lesions on conspecific and individual discrimination in pigeons.Behav. Brain Res. 49: 197–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S. & Y. Ito 1991 Discrimination of individuals in pigeons,Bird Behav. 9: 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S., E. Yamashita & M. Wakita 1993 Discrimination of video images of conspecific individuals in Bengalese finches.J. Ethol. 11: 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D.M. & M.E. Masson 1976 Attention in the pigeon: A reevaluation.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 26: 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, S., Jian, T. Visual and auditory cues in conspecific discrimination learning in Bengalese finches. J. Ethol. 11, 111–116 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350044

Keywords

Navigation