Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot

  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Effects of the length: width ratio of a leaf blade and petiole length on shoot light capture were studied with computer simulation. Both a larger length: width ratio and longer petiole contributed to larger light capture per unit leaf area due to a reduced aggregation of leaf area around the stem. Other conditions being equal, shoots with narrow leaves and no petioles and those with wide leaves with petioles showed similar light capture as long as the mean distance of the leaf blade from the stem was the same. In shoots with a short internode and/or distichous phyllotaxis, however, narrow leaves contributed more to avoiding mutual shading than wide leaves with petioles. The predominance of light coming from a higher angular altitude also favored narrow leaves. The possible consequences of these results in the adaptive geometry of plant architecture are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chazdon R. L. (1985) Leaf display, canopy structure and light interception of two understory palm species.American Journal of Botany 72: 1493–1502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T. J. (1979) On the adaptive significance of leaf form. In:Topics in Plant Population Biology (eds O. T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G. B. Johnson & P. H. Raven) pp. 375–407. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T. J. (1984) Leaf and canopy adaptations in tropical forests. In:Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics (eds E. Menina, H. A. Mooney & C. Vazquez-Yanes) pp. 51–84. Dr Junk Publisher, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T. J. (1987) Comparative studies of leaf form: Assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints.New Phytologist 106 (Suppl): 131–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T. J. &Vermeij G. J. (1976) Size and shapes of liane leaves.American Naturalist 110: 743–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn H. S. (1971)The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • King D. A. (1990) Allometry of saplings and understorey trees of a Panamanian forest.Functional Ecology 4: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohyama T. (1987) Significance of architecture and allometry in saplings.Functional Ecology 1: 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohyama T. &Hotta M. (1990) Significance of allometry in tropical saplings.Functional Ecology 4: 515–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas K. J. (1988) The role of phyllotactic pattern as a ‘developmental constraint’ on the interception of light by leaf surfaces.Evolution 42: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas K. J. (1989) The effect of leaf-lobing on the interception of direct solar radiation.Oecologia 80: 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reifsnyder W. E., Furnival G. M. &Horowitz J. L. (1971) Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies.Agricultural Meteorology 71: 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takenaka A. (1987) Analysis of light transmissivity of forest canopies with a telephoto method.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 40: 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton S. M. (1992) Understorey light environments in a north-east Australian rain forest before and after a tropical cyclone.Journal of Tropical Ecology 8: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Takenaka, A. Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot. Ecol. Res. 9, 109–114 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347485

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347485

Key words

Navigation