Skip to main content
Log in

Wine analysis: Study and comparison of techniques developed for the study of volatile constituents

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A number of headspace techniques have been compared, using a standard solution containing 12 compounds and a wine sample, viz.: (1) purge and cold trap injection; (2) dynamic headspace combined with liquidliquid extraction; (3) static headspace with and without preconcentration; (4) direct liquid injection. The sensitivity, reproducibility and speed of analysis were determined. Considering the results obtained and dependent on the purpose of the experiments and the number of samples to be examined the appropriate technique can be selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. O. Kwan, B. Kowalski, J. Agric. Food Chem.28, 356 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Noble, R. Flath, R. Forrey, J. Agric. Food Chem.28, 346 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Symonds, R. Cantagrel, Ann. Falsif. Expert. Chim.805, 63 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. van Zeller, B. Medina, Rapport des activités de Recherchest 1982–1983, Institut d'Oenologie de l'Université de Bordeaux II, Talence, France; p. 105.

  5. G. Scarponi, I. Moret, G. Capodaglio, P. Cescon J. Agric. Food Chem.30, 1135 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Schaefer, A. C. Tas, H. Maarse, M. C. ten Noever de Brauw, P. Slump, in “Instrumental analysis of foods, vol. 2”,G. Charalambous andG. Inglett, eds., Academic Press, New York, 1983, p. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Schaefer, in “Flavour 81”,G. Schreier, ed., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1981; p. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Bames, L. M. Law, A. J. MacLeod, Analyst106, 412 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Cole, J. Sci. Food. Agric.31, 1242 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Charalambous, ed., “Analysis of foods and beverages. Headspace techniques”, Academic Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Aishima, Agric. Biol. Chem.46, 2759 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Williams, H. May, O. Tucknott, J. Sci. Food Agric.29, 1041 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Bertuccioli, Vini d'Italia137, 62 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. J. Williams, C. Strauss, J. Inst. Brew.83, 213 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Murray, J. Chromatogr.135, 49 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Rapp, W. Knipser, Chromatographia13, 698 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. T. Badings, C. de Jong, R. Dooper, R. de Nijs in “Progress in flavour research”,J. Adda, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985; p. 523.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. T. Badings, C. de Jong, R. Dooper, in: “Proc. 6th Intern. Symp. Capill. Chromatogr.”, Huetig Verlag, Heidelberg, 1985; p. 666.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. A. Guichard, V. Ducruet, J. Agric. Food Chem.32, 838 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Ducruet, Lebensm. Wiss. Technol.17, 217 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etievant, P., Maarse, H. & van den Berg, F. Wine analysis: Study and comparison of techniques developed for the study of volatile constituents. Chromatographia 21, 379–386 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346136

Key Words

Navigation