Abstract
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the usefulness of a new, non-linear classifier method, called Hamming clustering (HC), in selecting prognostic variables affecting overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. In particular, the aim is to identify whether tumour proliferation parameters can be predictive factors of response in a set of 115 patients that receive either alternating chemo-radiotherapy or accelerated or conventional radiotherapy. HC is able to generate a set of understandable rules underlying the study objective; it can also select a subset of input variables that represent good prognostic factors. HC has been compared with other standard classifiers, providing better results in terms of classification accuracy. In particular, HC obtains the best accuracy of 74.8% (sensitivity of 51.1% and specificity of 91.2%) about survival. The rules found show that, besides the classical, well-known variables concerning the tumour dimension and the involved lymphonodes, some biological parameters, such as DNA ploidy, are also useful as predictive factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Corvö, R., Giaretti, W., Sanguineti, G., Geido, E., Orecchia, R., Guenzi, M., Margarino, G., Bacigalupo, A., Garaventa, G., Barbieri, M., andVitale, V. (1995): ‘In vivo cell kinetics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma predicts local control and helps guide radiotherapy regimen’,J. Clin. Oncol.,11, pp. 1843–1850
Corvö, R., Giaretti, W., Geido, E., Sanguineti, G., Orecchia, R., Scala, M., Garaventa, G., Mora, E., andVitale, V. (1996): Cell kinetics and tumor regression during radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma’,Int. J. Cancer,68, pp. 151–155
Hermanek, P., Hutter, R. V. P., Sobin, L. H., Wagner, G., andWitterkind, C. (Eds.) (1997): ‘TNM atlas’ (Springer-Verlag, Berlin)
Mangasarian, O. L., andWolberg, W. H. (1990): ‘Cancer diagnosis via linear programming’,SIAM News,23, pp. 1–18
Miller, A. B., Hoostraten, B., Staquet, M., Winkler, A. (1981): ‘Reporting results of cancer treatment’,Cancer,47, pp. 207–214
Mitchell, T. M. (1997): ‘Machine learning’, (Mc-Graw-Hill, New York)
Muselli, M., andLiberati, D. (2000): ‘Training digital circuits with hamming clustering’,IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.-I, Fundam. Theory Appl.,47, pp. 00-00
Quinlan, J. R. (1993): ‘C4.5 programs for machine learning’ (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California)
Ramoni, M., andSebastiani, P. (1998): ‘Parameter estimation in Bayesian networks from incomplete databases’,Intell. Data Anal.,21 (1), pp. 139–160
Ramoni, M., andSebastiani, P. (1999): ‘An introduction to the rebust Bayesian classifier’. Tech. Report Kmi-TR-79, The Open University, 9 March, 1999
Ritter, M. A. (1999): ‘Determination of tumor kinetics: Strategies for the delivery of radiotherapy and chemotherapy’,Curr. Opn. Oncol.,2, pp. 177–182
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., andWilliams, R. J. (1986): ‘Learning internal representations by error propagation’,in Rumelhart, D. E., andMcClelland, (Eds.): ‘Parallel distributed processing’, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts) pp. 318–362
Sanguineti, G., Corvò, R., Sormani, M. P., Benasso, M., Numico, G., Bacigalupo, A., Rosso, R., andVitale, V. (1999): ‘Chemotherapy alternated with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced head and carcinoma: predictive factors of outcome’,Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.,44, pp. 139–147
Wennerberg, J. (1996): ‘Predicting response to therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck’,Anticancer Res.,16, pp. 2389–2396
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paoli, G., Muselli, M., Bellazzi, R. et al. Hamming clustering techniques for the identification of prognostic indices in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 483–486 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345741
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345741