Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial neural network model of the mapping between electromyographic activation and trajectory patterns in free-arm movements

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used to identify the relationship between electromyographic (EMG) activity and arm kinematics during the execution of motor tasks. Although considerable work has been devoted to showing that ANNs perform this mapping, there has been little work to explore any relationship with physiological properties of the neuromuscular systems. A back-propagation through time (BPTT) ANN was used to map the EMG of five selected muscles (pectoralis major (PM), anterior deltoid (AD), posterior deltoid (PD), biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii (TB)) on arm kinematics in seven normal subjects performing three-dimensional unrestrained grasping movements. To investigate the physiological validity of the BPTT-ANN, inputs were artificially altered, and the predicted outputs were analysed. Results show that the BPTT-ANN performed the mapping correctly (root mean square (RMS) error between target and predicted outputs averaged across subject test sets was 0.092±0.015). Moreover, it provided insights into the roles of muscles in performing the movement (average indexes measuring the output alteration with respect to the target were 0.070±0.027, 0.356±0.172, 0.568±0.413, 0.510±0.268, 0.681±0.430 for PM, AD, PD, BB, TB, respectively, in the movement forward phase, and 0.077±0.015, 0.179±0.147, 0.291±0.247, 0.671±0.054, 0.232±0.097 in the return phase).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel, R. W. (1977): ‘Antagonist muscle activity during rapid arm movements: central vs proprioceptive influences’,J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,40, pp. 683–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, A. T. C., andKirsch, R. F. (2000): ‘EMG-based prediction of shoulder and elbow kinematics in able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals’,IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng.,8, pp. 471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campolucci, P., Uncini, A., Piazza, F., andRao, B. D. (1999): ‘On-line learning algorithms for locally recurrent neural networks’,IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.,10, pp. 253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheron, G., Draye, J. P., Bourgeios, M., andLibert, G. (1996): ‘A dynamic neural network identification of electromiography and arm trajectory relationship during complex movements’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,43, pp. 552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornay, M., Uno, Y., Kawato, M., andSuzuki, R. (1992): ‘Simulation of optimal movements using the minimum-muscle tensionchange model’, inMoody, J. M., Hanson, S. J., andLippman, R. P. (Eds): ‘Advances in neural information processing systems’ (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1992), pp. 627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Draye, J. P., Pavisic, D. A., Cheron, G. A., andLibert, G. (1996): ‘Dynamic recurrent neural networks: a dynamical analysis’,IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybern. B, Cybern.,26, pp. 692–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash, T., andHogan, N. (1985): ‘The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model’,J. Neurosci.,5, pp. 1688–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. L., Corcos, D. M., andAgarwal, G. C. (1989): ‘Organizing principles for single-joint movements I. A speed insensitive strategy’,J. Neurophysiol.,62, pp. 342–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenbuchner, M., andMaggini, M. (1999): ‘The BPTS-software package. A users manual’. Tech. Report, University of Wollongong, Australia and University of Siena, Italy

  • Hannaford, B., andStark, L. (1985): ‘Roles of elements of the tri-phasic control signal’,Exp. Neurol.,90, pp. 619–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happee, R. (1992): ‘Goat directed arm movement. I: analysis of EMG records of shoulder and elbow muscles’J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,2, pp. 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happee, R. (1993): ‘Goal directed arm movement. II: a kinematic model and its relation to EMG records’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,3, pp. 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Happee, R. (1994): ‘Inverse dynamic optimization including muscular dynamics, a new simulation method applied to goal directed movement’,J. Biomech.,27, pp. 953–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau, W. K. T., Bruce, I. C., Siu, L. Y. L., andChen, E. Y. H. (1998): ‘Motor programs: an artificial neural network approach’, Proc. 20th Annual Int. Conf. of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,20, pp. 1434–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R., andTucker, C. A. (2000): ‘Soft computing techniques for evaluation and control of human performance’, inWinters, J. M., andCrago, P. E. (Eds): ‘Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement’ (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), pp. 551–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, M., andKawato, M. (1993): ‘Virtual trajectory and stiffness ellipse during multijoint arm movement predicted by neural inverse models’,Biol. Cybern.,69, pp. 353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike, Y., andKawato, M. (1995): ‘Estimation of dynamic joint torques and trajectory formation from surface electromiography signals using a neural network model’,Biol. Cybern.,73, pp. 291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Luh, J. J., Chang, G. C., Cheng, C. K., Lai, J. S., andKuo, E. S. (1999): ‘Isokinetic elbow joint torques estimation from surface EMG and joint kinematic data: using an artificial neural network model’,J. Electromyogr: Kinesiol.,9, pp. 173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso, P. (1981): ‘Spatial control of arm movements’,Exp. Brain Res.,42, pp. 223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra, K. S., andParthasarathy, K. (1990): ‘Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks’,IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.,1, pp. 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes, J. N., andJennings, V. A. (1984): ‘Centrally programmed patterns of muscle activity in voluntary motor behavior in humans’,Exp. Brain Res.,54, pp. 23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroeve, S. (2000): ‘Commentary: what's the use of black box musculoskeletal models?’, inWinters, J. M., andCrago, P. E. (Eds): ‘Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement’ (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), pp. 456–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Helm, F. C. T. (2000): ‘Large-scale musculoskeletal systems: sensorymotor integration and optimisation’, inWinters, J. M., andCrago, P. E. (Eds): ‘Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement’ (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), pp. 407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman, W. J., Vand Der Gon, J. J. D., andDerksen, R. J. A. (1980): ‘Muscle activation patterns for fast directed arm movements’,J. Human Move. Stud.,6, pp. 19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbos, P. J. (1990): ‘Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it’,Proc. IEEE,78, pp. 1550–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., andKawato, M. (1998): ‘Multiple paired forward and inverse model for motor control’,Neural Netw.,11, pp. 1317–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Dipietro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dipietro, L., Sabatini, A.M. & Dario, P. Artificial neural network model of the mapping between electromyographic activation and trajectory patterns in free-arm movements. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 41, 124–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344879

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344879

Keywords

Navigation