Skip to main content
Log in

A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article a new acoustic parameter is introduced and it is shown that it may serve as an indicator of laryngeal function. It is termed the turbulent noise index (TNI) and is defined as 100(1−\(\bar R_{max} \)), where\(\bar R_{max} \) is the mean value of the maximum correlation coefficient between each pair of consecutive glottal cycles in the voiced signal. A method for its calculation is described. Experiments with synthetic and natural voice signals show that TNI is almost independent of frequency modulation noise and amplitude modulation noise. TNI is compared with HNR (harmonic-to-noise ratio) and NNE (normalised noise energy) which require high stationarity of the voice signal and are substantially affected by slow changes of frequency and amplitude. When the parameters HNR and NNE are used to discriminate between normal and pathological voices, the overlap area contains 21.5% and 23.5% of the total number of pathological voices, respectively. Using TNI, the voices, i.e. compared to the other noise parameters TNI has a significant advantage as a diagnostic parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bielamowicz, S., Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B., Dauer, M., andBerke, G. (1996): ‘Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement’,J. Speech Hear. Res.,39, pp. 126–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, D., andLee, C. (1991): ‘Vocal quality factors: Analysis, synthesis, and perception’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,90, pp. 2394–2410

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejonckere, P. (1995): ‘Principal components in voice pathology’,J. Voice,4, pp. 96–105

    Google Scholar 

  • De Krom, G. (1993): ‘A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to-noise ratio in speech signals’,J. Speech Hear. Res.,36, pp. 224–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskenazi, L., Childers, D., andHicks, D. (1990): ‘Acoustic correlates of vocal quality’,J. Speech Hear. Res.,33, pp. 298–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, J. (1988): ‘Perception of aperiodicities in synthetically generated voices’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,83, pp. 2361–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, M., Hibi, S., Yoshida, T., Hirade, Y., Kasuya, H., andKikuchi, Y. (1988): ‘Acoustic analysis of pathological voice’,Acta Oto-Laryngol.,105,pp. 432–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuya, H., Ogawa, S., Mashima, K., andEbihara, S. (1986): ‘Normalized noise energy as an acoustic measure to evaluate pathologic voice’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,80, pp. 1329–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingholz, F. (1987): ‘The measurement of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in continuous speech’,J. Speech Commun.,6, pp. 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieman, J., Gerratt, B., Kempster, G., Erman, A., andBerke, G. (1993): ‘Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research’,J. Speech Hear. Res.,36, pp. 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, D., Gramss, T., andStrube, H. (1997): ‘Glottal to noise excitation ratio—A new measure for describing pathological voices’,Acust. Acta Acust.,83, pp. 700–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Milenkovic, P. (1987): ‘Least mean square measures of voice perturbation’,J. Speech Hear. Res.,30, pp. 529–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitev, P. (1999): ‘Method for measurement of the turbulent noise of acoustic voiced signals’,Proc. Technical University-Sofia,50, Book 2, pp. 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Muta, H., Baer, T., Wagatsuma, K., Muraoka, T., andFukuda, H. (1988): ‘A pitch-synchronous analysis of hoarseness in running speech’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,84, pp. 1292–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., andHillman, R. (1997): ‘Temporal and spectral estimations of hamonics-to-noise ratio in human voice signals’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,102, pp. 537–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoentgen, J., Bensaid, M., Bucella, F., andCiocea, S. (1998): ‘Issues in the acousttic evaluation of laryngeal disorders’. Proc. VOICEDATA 98, pp. 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Yumoto, E., Gould, W., andBaer, T. (1982): ‘The harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness’,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,71, pp. 1544–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yumoto, E. (1983): ‘The quantitative evaluation of hoarseness. A new harmonics to noise ratio method’,Arch. Otolaryngology,109, pp. 48–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hadjitodorov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitev, P., Hadjitodorov, S. A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 625–631 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344867

Keywords

Navigation