Skip to main content
Log in

Floral morphology and phylogenetic analysis inCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae)

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floral morphology in all ten species ofCrossostylis, one of the inland genera of Rhizophoraceae and is distributed in the South Pacific Islands, was studied to increase our knowledge on floral features of individual species as well as on relationships among the species. Flowers ofCrossostylis, unlike those of the other Rhizophoraceae, always have semi-inferior ovaries and entire petals, but are diversified concerning the number and arrangement of stamens and carpels, the presence or absence of staminodia, sexuality and the structure of nectaries. Despite some doubt of the presence of apomorphies restricted to the whole genus, we tentatively definedCrossostylis by a combination of the presence of the semi-inferior ovary, entire petals, and arillate seeds, and then performed cladistic analysis on the basis of 24 floral and other morphological characters and withCarallia andGynotroches as outgroups. Our phylogenetic analysis suggested that the species ofCrossostylis are divided into two monophyletic groups: one comprising six species distributed in the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and the Fiji Islands, and the other comprising four species distributed in New Caledonia and Polynesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, A.H.G. 1925. Revision of the genusCassipourea. Kew Bull.1925: 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenes, J. 1954. Fam. 150. Rhizophoracees.In H. Humbert, ed., Flore de Madagascar et des Comores, Typographie Firmin-Didot, Paris, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G. 1865. Rhizophoraceae.In G. Bentham and J.D. Hooker, eds., Genera Plantarum, vol. 1, Reeve & Co., London, pp. 677–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1952. Wayside Trees of Malaya. vol. 1, 2nd ed, Government Printing Office, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou 1958. Rhizophoraceae. Flora Malesiana.5: 429–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou andvan Steenis, C.G.G.J. 1963.Crossostylis.In C.G.G.J. van Steenis, ed., Pacific Plants Areas, vol. 1, Manila Bureau of Printing, Manila, pp. 290–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geh, S.Y. andKeng, H. 1974. Morphological studies on some inland Rhizophoraceae. Garden Bull. Straits Settlem.27: 183–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. andDalziel, J.M., 1954. Flora of West Tropical Africa. 2nd ed., Crown Agents for Overseas Governments and Administrations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncosa, A.M. 1988. Floral development and character evolution in Rhizophoraceae.In P. Leins, S.C. Tucker and P.K. Endress, eds., Aspects of Floral Development, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp. 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncosa, A.M. andTomlinson, P.B. 1988a. A historical and taxonomic synopsis of Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1278–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncosa, A.M. andTomlinson, P.B. 1988b. Systematic comparison and some biological characters of Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1296–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morat, Ph., Veillon, J.M. andMackee, H.S. 1986. Floristic relationships of New Caledonian rainforest phanerogams. Telopea2: 631–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oginuma, K., Setoguchi, H., Ohba, H. andTobe, H. 1992. Karyomorphology ofCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae). Bot. Mag. Tokyo105: 549–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham, J.W. 1972. Plants of the Fiji Islands. 2nd ed., The Government Printer, Suva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R. andTurner, M.D. 1977. Contrad 70, an effective softner of herbarium material for anatomical study. Taxon26: 551–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimper, A.F.W. 1893. Rhizophoraceae.In A. Engler and K. Prantl, eds., Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 3 (7), Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setoguchi, H., Tobe, H. andOhba, H. 1992. Seed coat anatomy ofCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae): its evolutionary and systematic implications. Bot. Mag. Tokyo105: 625–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setoguchi, H. andOhba, H. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships inCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae) inferred from restriction site variation of chloroplast DNA. J. Plant Res.108: 87–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. 1952. Studies of pacific island plants. XI. Further notes on Fijian flowering plants. J. Arnold Arbor.33: 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. 1981. Flora Vitiensis Nova. vol. 2, Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, T.A. andBoodle, L.A., 1909. Kokoti (Anopyxis ealaensis Sprague). Kew Bull.1909: 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, J.A. andLiesner, R. 1983. Revision of the genusSterigmapetalum (Rhizophoraceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.70: 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, ver. 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

  • Tobe, H. andRaven, P.H. 1988. Seed morphology and anatomy of Rhizophoraceae, inter- and infrafamilial relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1319–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P.B. 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Setoguchi, H., Ohba, H. & Tobe, H. Floral morphology and phylogenetic analysis inCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae). J. Plant Res. 109, 7–19 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344282

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344282

Key words

Navigation