Skip to main content
Log in

Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil—impact and importance

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions between bacteria and protozoa in soil were studied over 2-week periods in the field and in a pot experiment. Under natural conditions the total biological activity was temporarily synchronized by a large rainfall, and in the laboratory by the addition of water to dried-out soil, with or without plants. In the field, peaks in numbers and biomass of bacteria appeared after the rain, and a peak of naked amoebae quickly followed. Of the three investigated groups—flagellates, ciliates, and amoebae—only populations of the latter were large enough and fluctuated in a way that indicated a role as bacterial regulators. The bacterial increase was transient, and the amoebae alone were calculated to be able to cause 60% of the bacterial decrease. The same development of bacteria and protozoa was observed in the pot experiment: in the presence of roots, amoebic numbers increased 20 times and became 5 times higher than in the unplanted soil. In the planted pots, the amoebic increase was large enough to cause the whole bacterial decrease observed; but in the unplanted soil, consumption by the amoebae caused only one-third of the bacterial decrease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bååth, E., U. Lohm, B. Lundgren, T. Rosswall, B. Söderström, B. Sohlenius, and A. Wirén: The effect of nitrogen and carbon supply on the development of soil organism populations and pine seedlings; a microcosm experiment. Oikos31, 153–163 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Band, R. N.: Nutritional and related biological studies on the freeliving soil amoeba,Hartmannella rhysoides. J. Gen. Microbiol.21, 80–95 (1959)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, C. A., and V. O. Biederbeck: Soil bacterial changes as affected by growing season weather conditions. A field and laboratory study. Can. J. Soil Sci.56, 293–310 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarholm, M., and T. Rosswall: Biomass and turnover of bacteria in a forest soil and tundra peat. Soil Biol. Biochem.12, 49–51 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman, D. C., R. V. Anderson, C. V. Cole, E. T. Elliott, L. Woods, and M. K. Campion: Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. IV. Flow of metabolic and biomass carbon. Microb. Ecol.4, 373–380 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cutler, D. W.: Soil protozoa and bacteria in relation to their environment. J. Quekett Microsc. Club. Ser. 2,15, 309–330 (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cutler, D. W., and L. M. Crump: Daily periodicity in the numbers of active soil flagellates: with a brief note on the relations of trophic amoebae and bacterial numbers. Ann. Appl. Biol.7, 11–24 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cutler, D. W., and L. M. Crump: The qualitative and quantitative effects of food on the growth of a soil amoeba (Hartmannella hyalina). Br. J. Exp. Biol.5, 155–165 (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danso, S. K. A., and M. Alexander: Regulation of predation by prey density: The protozoan-Rhizobium relationship. Appl. Microbiol.29, 515–521 (1975)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Darbyshire, J. F., and M. P. Greaves: Protozoa and bacteria in the rhizosphere ofSinapis alba L.,Trifolium repens L. andLolium perenne L. Can. J. Microbiol.13, 1057–1068 (1967)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Darbyshire, J. F., and M. P. Greaves: Bacteria and protozoa in the rhizosphere. Pestic. Sci.4, 349–360 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Darbyshire, J. F., R. F. Wheatley, M. P. Greaves, and R. H. E. Inkson: A rapid micromethod for estimating bacterial and protozoan populations in soil. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol11, 465–475 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elliott, E. T., and D. C. Coleman: Soil protozoan dynamics in a shortgrass prairie. Soil Biol. Biochem.9, 113–118 (1977)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott, E. T., C. V. Cole, D. C. Coleman, R. V. Anderson, H. W. Hunt, and J. F. McClellan: Amoebal growth in soil microcosms. A model system of C, N and P. Trophic dynamics. Int. J. Environ. Stud.13, 169–174 (1979)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott, E. T., D. C. Coleman, and C. V. Cole: The influence of amoebae on the uptake of nitrogen by plants in gnotobiotic soil. In J. D. Harley and R. Scott Russell (eds): The Soil Root Interface, pp. 221–229. Academic Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fenchel, T. M., and B. Barker Jorgensen: Detritus food chains of aquatic ecosystems: The role of bacteria. Adv. Microb. Ecol.1, 1–58 (1977)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geltzer, J. G.: On the behaviour of soil amoebae in the rhizospheres of plants. Pedobiologia2, 249–251 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habte, M., and M. Alexander: Protozoa as agents responsible for the decline ofXanthomonas campestris in soil. Appl. Microbiol.29, 159–164 (1975)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Habte, M., and M. Alexander: Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa. Arch. Microbiol.113, 181–183 (1977)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hattori, T.: Microbial Life in Soil. Marcel Dekker, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen, A. L., and R. C. Ball: Variation in the availability of food as a cause of fluctuations in predator and prey population densities. Ecology51, 517–520 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch, J. M., and L. M. Panting: Variations in the size of the soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem.12, 547–550 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Noland, L. F.: Factors influencing the distribution of fresh water ciliates. Ecology6, 437–452 (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ogata, S., H. Miyamoto, and S. Hayashida: An investigation of the influence of bacteriophages on the bacterial flora and purification powers of active sludge. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.26, 97–108 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Page, F. C.: Taxonomic criteria for limax amoebae, with descriptions of 3 new species ofHartmannella and 3 ofVahlkampfia. J. Protozool.14, 499–521 (1967)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sohlenius, B.: A carbon budget for nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades in a Swedish coniferous forest soil. Holarctic Ecol.2, 30–40 (1979)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stotzky, G., and A. G. Norman: Factors limiting microbial growth activities in soil. III. Supplementary substrate additions. Can. J. Microbiol.10, 143–147 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stout, J. D.: The relationship between protozoan populations and biological activity in soils. Am. Zool.13, 193–201 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stout, J. D.: The role of protozoa in nutrient cycling and energy flow. Adv. Microb. Ecol.4, 1–50 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stout, J. D., and O. W. Heal: Protozoa. In A. Burges and F. Raw(eds.): Soil Biology, pp. 149–195. Academic Press, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Umorin, P. P.: Relationships between bacteria and flagellates in destruction of organic matter. Zh. Obshch. Biol.37, 831–835 (1976) (in Russian, English summary)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarholm, M. Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil—impact and importance. Microb Ecol 7, 343–350 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02341429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02341429

Keywords

Navigation