Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative transient gene expression: Comparison of the promoters for maize polyubiquitin1, rice actin1, maize-derivedEmu andCaMV 35S in cells of barley, maize and tobacco

  • Papers
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The particle gun approach was used for the quantification of promoter efficiency in a test system for transient gene expression. β-Glucuronidase was used as reporter gene for determining promotote strength. The variability inherent in this gene transfer system was considerably reduced by calculating a transformation efficiency factor given by the expression of a cotransferred second reporter gene (firefly luciferase). The calibration of β-glucuronidase activity by the transformation efficiency factor caused a lower statistical variance of the values and allowed reliable results to be obtained with a smaller set of repetitions. The CaMV 35S promoter (as a control) and the monocot-specific promoters for maize polyubiquitin1, rice actin 1 and the maize-derivedEmu were characterized and compared with respect to expression strength, as tested under identical conditions in suspension cell cultures of maize, barley and tobacco. Compared to the 35S promoter, the monocot-specific promoters show up to 15-fold higher expression in maize and barley but give only weak expression in tobacco. No expression was found for the rice actin 1 promoter in tobacco. The level of reporter gene expression is influenced by the osmotic potential in the agar medium. For theEmu promoter, the calibrated β-glucuronidase activities remained mearly constant at low sucrose concentrations. Above 8% sucrose, the calibrated activities increased steadily with increasing osmotic conditions, reaching a three-to four-fold higher level at the highest sucrose concentration (32%) as compared to the standard concentration (4% sucrose) in the medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwen, A., Moreno, S.M.B., Vincente, O. and Heberle-Bors, E. (1992) Plant endogenous β-glucuronidase activity: how to avoid interference with the use of theE. coli β-glucuronidase as a reporter gene in transgenic plants.Transgenic Res. 1, 63–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgramme quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callis, J., Fromm, M. and Walbot, V. (1987) Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells.Genes Devel. 1, 1183–1200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.H., Sharrock, R.A. and Quail, P.H. (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation.Pl. Mol. Biol. 18, 675–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehneke, J., Gosselé, V., Bottermann, J. and Cornenlissen, M. (1989) Quantitative analysis of transiently expressed genes in plant cells.Meth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wet, J., Wood, K.V., De Luca, M., Helkinki, D.R. and Subramani, S (1987) The firefly luciferase gene: expression in mammalian cells.Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 725–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, B.A. and Schuler, M.A. (1988) Plant intron sequences: evidence for distinct groups of introns.Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 7159–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, R.A. Kavanagh, T.A. and Bevan, M.W. (1987) GUS-fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants.EMBO J. 6, 3901–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, T.M., Gradziel, T., Fromm, M. and Sanford, J.C. (1988) Factors influencing gene delivery intoZea mays cells by high-velocity microprojectiles.Bio/Technology 6, 559–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanahan, M.B., Ho, T., Rodgers, S.W. and Rodgers, J.C. (1992) A gibberell:n response complex in cereal α-amylase gene promoters.Pl. Cell 4, 203–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Last, D.I., Brettell, R.I.S., Chamberlaine, D.A., Chaudhury, A.M., Larkin, P.J., Marsh, E.L., Peacock, W.J., and Dennis, E.S. (1991) pEmu: An improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cells.Theor. Appl. Gen. 81, 581–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lepetit, M., Ehling, M., Gigot, C. and Hahne, G. (1991) An internal standard improves the variability of transient expression studies in plant protoplasts.Pl. Cell Rep. 10, 401–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C., Laufs, J., Grant, S., Korfhage, C. and Werr, W. (1991) The combination of a novel stimulatory element in the first exon of the maize Shrunken-1 gene with the following intron 1 enhances reporter gene expression up to 1000-fold.Pl. Mol. Biol. 16, 199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular cloning: a Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, D., Zhang, W., Cao, J. and Wu, R. (1990) Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation.Plant Cell,2, 163–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer, R., Pröls, M., Schell, J. and Steinbiß, H.H. (1988a) Transient gene expression in tobacco protoplasts: II. Comparison of reporter gene systems for CAT, NPT II and GUS.Pl. Cell Rep. 7, 225–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer, R., Schell, J. and Steinbiß, H.H. (1988b) Versatile cloning vectors for gene expression and direct gene transfer in plant cells.Nucl. Acid Res. 16, 8725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, J.C. (1988) The biolistic process.Trends Biotech. 6, 299–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vain, P., McMullen, M.D. and Finer, J.J. (1993) Osmotic treatment enhances particle bombardment-mediated transient and stable transformation of maize.Pl. Cell Rep. 12, 84–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schledzewski, K., Mendel, R.R. Quantitative transient gene expression: Comparison of the promoters for maize polyubiquitin1, rice actin1, maize-derivedEmu andCaMV 35S in cells of barley, maize and tobacco. Transgenic Research 3, 249–255 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336778

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336778

Keywords

Navigation