Skip to main content
Log in

New approaches to motor unit potential analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current state of motor unit potential (MUP) analysis is reviewed. New quantitative analysis methods are described and compared with traditional manual measurements. The emphasis in this review is on a new method, multi-MUP analysis and the detection of individual outliers. Multi-MUP analysis is based on decomposition EMG. The main advantage of these new methods is that they save time and allow immediate comparison between obtained results and reference values. The results are repeatable and independent of the investigator.

Sommario

Viene presentata una revisione delle tecniche di analisi dei potenziali di unità motoria (PUM). Vengono descritti nuovi metodi di analisi quantitativa e paragonati al metodo tradizionale di misura manuale. Particolare rilievo viene dato ad un nuovo metodo, analisi multi-MUP e alla definizione di valori limite. L'analisi multi-MUP è basata sulla scomposizione dell'EMG. Il maggior vantaggio di questi nuovi metodi è nel risparmio di tempo e nella possibilità di una immediata comparazione tra i risultati ottenuti e i valori di riferimento. I risultati sono riproducibili e indipendenti dalla soggettività dell'esaminatore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreassen S.:Computerized analysis of motor unit firing. In: Desmedt J.E. (ed.) Computered-Aided Electromyography. Prog. Clin. Neurophysiol. Vol. 10 Karger, Basel 150–163, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bischoff C., Stålberg E., et al.:Reference values of motor unit potentials recorded with multi-MUP EMG. Muscle Nerve, in press.

  3. Buchthal F.:An introduction to electromyography. Scandinavian University Press, Copenhagen 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchthal F., Clemmensen S.:On the differentiation of muscle atrophy by electromyography. Acta Psychiat. Neurol. 16: 143–181, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchthal F., Guld C., et al.:Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variable. Acta Physiol. Scand. 32:200–215, 1954.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchthal F., Guld C., Rosenfalck P. Multielectrode study of the territory of a motor unit. Acta Physiol. Scand. 39:83–103, 1957.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchthal F., Pinelli P., et al.:Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. Acta Physiol. Scand. 22:219–229, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Luca C.J., Le Fever R.S., et al.:Controls scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions. J. Physiol. 329:129–142, 1982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flack B.:Automatic analysis of individual motor unit potentials recorded with a special two channel electrode. MD Thesis, Turku.

  10. Feinstein B., Lindegård B., et al.:Morphologic studies or motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat. 23:127–142, 1955.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gath I., Stålberg E.:In situ measurement of the innervation ratio of motor units in human muscles Exp. Brain. Res. 43:377–382, 1981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guiheneuc P., Calamel J., et al.:Automatic detection and pattern recognition of single motor unit potentials in needle EMG. In: (ed. Desmedt J.E.) Computer-Aided Electromyography, Progr. Clin. Neurophysiology. Vol. 10 Karger, Basel 73–127, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howard J.E., McGill K.C., et al.:Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes; ADEMG analysis. Muscle Nerve 11:1051–1055, 1988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosarov D., Gydikov A.:The influence of volume conduction on the shape of action potentials recorded by various types of needle electrodes in normal human muscle. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15:319–335, 1975.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang A.H., Vaahtoranta K.M.:The baseline, the time characteristics and the slow afterwaves of the motor unit potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 35:387–394, 1973.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Fever R.S., De Luca C.J.:A procedure for decomposing the myoelectric signal into its constituent action potentials. I: Technique, theory and implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed. Engin. 29:149–157, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGill K.C., Cummins K.L., et al.:Automatic decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram. IEEE Trans Biomed. Engin. 32:470–477, 1985.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McGill K.C., Dorfman L.J.:Automatic EMG decomposition in brachial biceps. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:453–461, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nandedkar S.D., Barkhaus P.E., et al.:Analysis of the amplitude and area of the concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:561–567, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nandedkar S.D., Sanders D.B., et al.:Selectivity of electromyographic recording electrodes. Med. Biol. Engin. Comp. 23:536–540, 1985.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nandedkar S., Stålberg E.:Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Muscle and Nerve 11:151–159, 1988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacco G., Buchthal F., et al.:Motor unit potentials at different ages. Arch. Neurol. 6:366–373, 1962.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sonoo M., Stålberg E.:The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG; Analysis of the MUP “thickness” and the proposal of a “Size Index”. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89:291–303, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stålberg E., Andreassen S., et al.:Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials—A proposition for standardized terminology and criteria for measurement. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 3:313–348, 1986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stålberg E., Antoni L.:Computer Aided EMG analysis. In: (ed. Desmedt J.E.) Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology vol. 10. Computer aided analysis of EMG Karger, Basel 186–234, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stålberg E., Bischoff C., et al.:Outliers, a way to detect abnormality in quantitative EMG. Muscle and Nerve, in press.

  27. Stålberg E., Dioseghy P.:Scanning EMG in normal muscle and in neuromuscular disorders. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 81:403–416, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stålberg E., Sonoo M., et al.:Assessment of the variability in motor unit shape at consecutive discharges, in press.

  29. Thiele B., Boehle A.:Number of single muscle fibre action potentials contributing to the motor unit potential. In: Fifth International Congress of Electromyography. Rochester, Minnesota, 21–24, 1975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR (CI) and Grant 135 Swedish Medical Research Council (ES).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iani, C., Stålberg, E., Falck, B. et al. New approaches to motor unit potential analysis. Ital J Neuro Sci 15, 447–459 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334606

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334606

Key words

Navigation