Abstract
The current state of motor unit potential (MUP) analysis is reviewed. New quantitative analysis methods are described and compared with traditional manual measurements. The emphasis in this review is on a new method, multi-MUP analysis and the detection of individual outliers. Multi-MUP analysis is based on decomposition EMG. The main advantage of these new methods is that they save time and allow immediate comparison between obtained results and reference values. The results are repeatable and independent of the investigator.
Sommario
Viene presentata una revisione delle tecniche di analisi dei potenziali di unità motoria (PUM). Vengono descritti nuovi metodi di analisi quantitativa e paragonati al metodo tradizionale di misura manuale. Particolare rilievo viene dato ad un nuovo metodo, analisi multi-MUP e alla definizione di valori limite. L'analisi multi-MUP è basata sulla scomposizione dell'EMG. Il maggior vantaggio di questi nuovi metodi è nel risparmio di tempo e nella possibilità di una immediata comparazione tra i risultati ottenuti e i valori di riferimento. I risultati sono riproducibili e indipendenti dalla soggettività dell'esaminatore.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreassen S.:Computerized analysis of motor unit firing. In: Desmedt J.E. (ed.) Computered-Aided Electromyography. Prog. Clin. Neurophysiol. Vol. 10 Karger, Basel 150–163, 1983.
Bischoff C., Stålberg E., et al.:Reference values of motor unit potentials recorded with multi-MUP EMG. Muscle Nerve, in press.
Buchthal F.:An introduction to electromyography. Scandinavian University Press, Copenhagen 1957.
Buchthal F., Clemmensen S.:On the differentiation of muscle atrophy by electromyography. Acta Psychiat. Neurol. 16: 143–181, 1941.
Buchthal F., Guld C., et al.:Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variable. Acta Physiol. Scand. 32:200–215, 1954.
Buchthal F., Guld C., Rosenfalck P. Multielectrode study of the territory of a motor unit. Acta Physiol. Scand. 39:83–103, 1957.
Buchthal F., Pinelli P., et al.:Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. Acta Physiol. Scand. 22:219–229, 1954.
De Luca C.J., Le Fever R.S., et al.:Controls scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions. J. Physiol. 329:129–142, 1982.
Flack B.:Automatic analysis of individual motor unit potentials recorded with a special two channel electrode. MD Thesis, Turku.
Feinstein B., Lindegård B., et al.:Morphologic studies or motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat. 23:127–142, 1955.
Gath I., Stålberg E.:In situ measurement of the innervation ratio of motor units in human muscles Exp. Brain. Res. 43:377–382, 1981.
Guiheneuc P., Calamel J., et al.:Automatic detection and pattern recognition of single motor unit potentials in needle EMG. In: (ed. Desmedt J.E.) Computer-Aided Electromyography, Progr. Clin. Neurophysiology. Vol. 10 Karger, Basel 73–127, 1983.
Howard J.E., McGill K.C., et al.:Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes; ADEMG analysis. Muscle Nerve 11:1051–1055, 1988.
Kosarov D., Gydikov A.:The influence of volume conduction on the shape of action potentials recorded by various types of needle electrodes in normal human muscle. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15:319–335, 1975.
Lang A.H., Vaahtoranta K.M.:The baseline, the time characteristics and the slow afterwaves of the motor unit potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 35:387–394, 1973.
Le Fever R.S., De Luca C.J.:A procedure for decomposing the myoelectric signal into its constituent action potentials. I: Technique, theory and implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed. Engin. 29:149–157, 1982.
McGill K.C., Cummins K.L., et al.:Automatic decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram. IEEE Trans Biomed. Engin. 32:470–477, 1985.
McGill K.C., Dorfman L.J.:Automatic EMG decomposition in brachial biceps. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61:453–461, 1985.
Nandedkar S.D., Barkhaus P.E., et al.:Analysis of the amplitude and area of the concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:561–567, 1988.
Nandedkar S.D., Sanders D.B., et al.:Selectivity of electromyographic recording electrodes. Med. Biol. Engin. Comp. 23:536–540, 1985.
Nandedkar S., Stålberg E.:Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Muscle and Nerve 11:151–159, 1988.
Sacco G., Buchthal F., et al.:Motor unit potentials at different ages. Arch. Neurol. 6:366–373, 1962.
Sonoo M., Stålberg E.:The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG; Analysis of the MUP “thickness” and the proposal of a “Size Index”. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89:291–303, 1993.
Stålberg E., Andreassen S., et al.:Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials—A proposition for standardized terminology and criteria for measurement. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 3:313–348, 1986.
Stålberg E., Antoni L.:Computer Aided EMG analysis. In: (ed. Desmedt J.E.) Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology vol. 10. Computer aided analysis of EMG Karger, Basel 186–234, 1983.
Stålberg E., Bischoff C., et al.:Outliers, a way to detect abnormality in quantitative EMG. Muscle and Nerve, in press.
Stålberg E., Dioseghy P.:Scanning EMG in normal muscle and in neuromuscular disorders. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 81:403–416, 1991.
Stålberg E., Sonoo M., et al.:Assessment of the variability in motor unit shape at consecutive discharges, in press.
Thiele B., Boehle A.:Number of single muscle fibre action potentials contributing to the motor unit potential. In: Fifth International Congress of Electromyography. Rochester, Minnesota, 21–24, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR (CI) and Grant 135 Swedish Medical Research Council (ES).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iani, C., Stålberg, E., Falck, B. et al. New approaches to motor unit potential analysis. Ital J Neuro Sci 15, 447–459 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334606
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334606