Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations after intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median nerve stimulation were used to monitor cerebral function during 26 carotid endarterectomies. The patients with minor SEP variations had no neurological deficits on regaining consciousness while the one with more serious SEP variations had a transient deficit. The method thus seems useful in the early detection of ischemic brain impairment.

Sommario

I Potenziali Evocati Somatosensoriali (PES) da stimolazione del nervo mediano sono stati usati come metodo per monitorare la funzione cerebrale durante endoarteriectomia carotidea.

Sono stati eseguiti 26 interventi di endoarteriectomia carotidea in 23 pazienti. Durante il clampaggio carotideo, più frequentemente si è osservato un aumento della latenza della P25, che in nessun caso è risultato superiore ai 2 msec.

In un solo paziente si è registrato un appiattimento monolaterale della traccia con scomparsa delle componenti N20 e P25; tale paziente era l'unico a presentare un deficit neurologico al risveglio. I nostri dati sembrano suggerire l'utilità del monitoraggio intraoperatorio del PES del mediano, al fine di svelare una sofferenza ischemica cerebrale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Branston N.M., Symon L., Crockard H.A., Pasztor E.:Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. Exp. Neurol. 45:195–208, 1974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiappa K.H., Burke S.R., Young R.R.:Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 367 carotid endarterectomies. Use of a dedicated minicomputer. Stroke 10:381–388, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiappa K.H., Choi S.K., Young R.R.:Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in patients with neurological lesions. In: Desmedt JE (ed): Clinical use of cerebral, brainstem and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials. Progress in clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 7 Basel S. Karger, 264–281, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drummond J.C., Todd M.M., Sang U.H.:The effect of high dose sodium thiopental on brain stem auditory and median nerve somatosensory evoked responses in Humans. Anesthesiology 63:249–254, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson G.G.:Carotid endarterectomy. To shunt or not to shunt? Arch. Neurol. 43:615–617, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy B.L.:Intraoperative monitoring of sensory-evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 58:72–87, 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hays R.J., Levinson S.A., Wylie E.J.:Intraoperative measurement of carotid back pressure as a guide to operative management for carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 72:953–960, 1972.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs L.A., BrinkmanS.D., Morrel R.M., Shirley J.G., Ganji S.:Long-latency somatosensory evoked Potentials during carotid endarterectomy. Am. Surg. 49:338–344, 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lesnick J.E., Michele J.J., Simeone F.A., De Feo S., Welsh F.A.:Alteration of somatosensory evoked potentials in response to global ischemia. J. Neurosurg. 60:490–494, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Markand O.N., Dilley R.S., Moorthy S.S., Warren C.:Monitoring of somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy. Arch. Neurol. 41:375–378, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcpherson R.W., Johnson R.M., Graf M.:Intraoperative neurological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: Electroencephalogram versus somatosensory evoked potential. Anesthesiology 59:368, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mcpherson R.W., Zeger S., Traystman R.J.:Relationship of somatosensory evoked potentials and cerebral oxygen consumption during hypoxic hypoxia in dogs. Stroke 17:30–36, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore W.S., Hall A.D.:Carotid artery back pressure: a test of cerebral tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion. Arch. Surg. 99:702–710, 1969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ojemann R.G., Heros R.C.:Carotid endarterectomy. To shunt or not to shunt? Arch. Neurol. 43:617–618, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharbrough F.W., Messick J.M., Sundt T.M.:Correlation of continuous electroencephalograms with cerebral blood flow measurement during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 4:674–683, 1973.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sundt T.M., Sharbrugh F.W., Piepgras D.G., Kearns T.P., Messick J.M., O'Fallow W.M.:Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 56:533–543, 1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carenini, L., Bottacchi, E., Camerlingo, M. et al. Considerations after intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy. Ital J Neuro Sci 10, 315–320 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333778

Key-Words

Navigation