Summary
Pain threshold was measured using a simple pressure algometer in 190 subjects. The measurement had a highly acceptable intra-observer error. Significantly lower pain thresholds were observed in all of the five areas of the body studied in females. The most sensitive area was the forehead. There was a higher pain threshold in the dominant hand. Anxiety and fear of pain significantly reduced the threshold.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beecher, H. K. The measurement of pain. Pharmacol Rev 1957, 9, 59–209.
Keele, K.D. Pain sensitivity tests. The pressure algometer. Lancet 1954, 1, 636–639.
Clutton-Brock, J. An improved device for measurement of pain threshold. Anaesthesia 1964, 19, 593–597.
Hardy, J.D., Wolff, H.G., Goodell, H. Studies of pain. A new method for measuring pain threshold-observations on spatial summation of pain. J Clin Invest 1940, 19, 649–680.
Robson, J.G., Davenport, H.T., Sugiyama, R. Differentiation of two types of pain by anaesthetics. Anaesthesiology 1969, 26, 217–228.
Wolff, B., Kantor, T.C., Jarvik, M.E., Lusha, E. Response of experimental pain to analgesic drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1969, 10, 217–228.
Hewer, A.J.H., Keele, C.A. A method of testing analgesics in man. Lancet 1948, 2, 683–688.
Armstrong, D., Dry, R.M.L., Keele, C.A., Markham, J.W. Methods for studying chemical excitants of cutaneous pain in man. J Physiol 1951, 115, 59–61.
O'Driscoll, S.L. Pain threshold analysis. Clin Rheum Dis 1976, 2, 27–35.
Orloff, S. Pain tolerance threshold and pain perception threshold: clinical and experimental studies. Clin Rheum Dis 1979, 5, 755–773.
Jensen, K., Anderson, H.O., Olesen, J., Lindblom, U. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain 1986, 25, 313–323.
O'Driscoll, S.L., Jayson, M.I.V. Pain threshold analysis in patients with osteoarthrosis of hip. Br Med J 1974, 3, 714–715.
Huskisson, E.C., Hart, F.D. Pain threshold and arthritis. Br Med J 1972, 4, 193–195.
Campbell, S.M., Clark, S., Tindall, E. A., Forehand, M.E., Bennett, R.M. Clinical characteristics of fibrositis. Arthritis Rheum 1983, 26, 817–824.
Reeves, J.L., Jaeger, B., Graff-Radford, S.B. Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain 1986, 24, 313–321.
McClave, J.T., Benson, P.G. Two samples: Estimation and Test of Hypotheses. Statistics for Business and Economics. San Francisco, California, Dellen Publishing Co 1979, 252–269.
Sternbach, R.A. Psychophysiology of pain. Int J Psychiat Med 1975, 6, 63–73.
Lawis, G.F., Achterberg, J., Kenner, L., Kopetz, K. Ethnic and sex differences in response to clinical and induced pain in chronic spinal pain patients. Spine 1984, 9, 751–754.
Hall, K.R.L., Stride, E. The varying response to pain in psychiatric disorders: a study in abnormal psychology. Br J Med Psychol 1954, 27, 48–60.
Merskey, H., Spear, F.G. The reliability of the pressure algometer. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1964, 3, 130–136.
Chapman, W.P., Jones, C.M. Variations in cutaneous and visceral pain sensitivity in normal subjects. J Clin Invest 1944, 23, 81–91.
Neri, M., Agazzani, E. Aging and right-left asymmetry in experimental pain measurement. Pain 1984, 19, 43–48.
Wolff, B.B., Jarvik, M. Relationship between superficial and deep somatic thesholds of pain with a note on handed-ness. Am J of Psychol 1964, 77, 589–599.
Haslam, D.R. Lateral dominance in the perception of size and of pain. Q J Exp Psychol 1970, 22, 503–507.
Hill, H.E., Kornetsky, C.H., Flanary, H.G., Wikler, A. Effects of anxiety and morphine on discrimination of intensities of pain stimuli. J Clin Invest 1952, 31, 473–480.
Hill, H.E., Kornetsky, C.H., Flanary, H.G., Wikler, A. Studies on anxiety associated with anticipation of pain. (i). Effects of morphine. Arch Neurol Psych 1952, 67, 612–619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchanan, H.M., Midgley, J.A. Evaluation of pain threshold using a simple pressure algometer. Clin Rheumatol 6, 510–517 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330587
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330587