Skip to main content
Log in

Macroscopic static and dynamic mechanical properties of Yule marble

The mechanical properties of a commercially purchased slab of Yule marble are investigated primarily as a function of strain rate, without consideration of the effects of other parameters

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The static and dynamic tensile and compressive properties of Colorado Yule marble have been obtained from samples all secured from the same parent slab. Specimens were cored in the three principal directions of this transversely isotropic material, the axis of symmetry having been determined petrographically. Standard quasi-static and creep tests were performed, and both Hopkinson-bar and split-Hopkinson-bar tests were conducted for the collection of data at higher loading rates. Elastic constants evaluated for the material on the basis of the present investigation were compared with corresponding static and dynamic values from a previous series of tests conducted on a large block of Yule marble, and to dynamic constants for the same block determined in a separate investigation by means of wavespeed data secured from embedded crystal transducers. The behavior of Yule marble does not seem to conform to any well-known constitutive relation and is, thus, most easily characterized by suitable sets of experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferreira, M. P. andTurner, F. J., “Microscopic Structure and Fabric of Yule Marble Experimentally Deformed at Different Strain Rates,”J. Geol.,72,861 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thill, R. E., Willard, R. J. and Bur, T. R., “Correlation of Longitudinal Velocity Variation with Rock Fabric,” J. Geophys. Res.,74 (1969).

  3. Heard, H. C., “The Effect of Large Changes in Strain Rate in the Experimental Deformation of Yule Marble,”J. Geol.,71,162 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rock Deformation, ed. by D. Griggs andJ. Handin, Memoir,79,Geol. Soc. Amer.,New York (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, F. J., “Nature and Dynamic Interpretation of Deformation Lamellae in Calcite of Three Marbles,”Amer. J. Sci.,251,276 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knopf, E. B., “Fabric Changes in Yule Marble After Deformation in Compression, I: Preliminary Petrofabric Analysis of Yule Marble,”Amer. J. Sci.,247,433 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turner, F. J., “Preferred Orientation of Calcite in Yule Marble,”Amer. J. Sci.,247,593 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ricketts, T. E., “Sphere Impact on an Anisotropic Half-Space,” PhD Diss.,Univ. of California, Berkeley (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ricketts, T. E. andGoldsmith, W., “Dynamic Properties of Rocks and Composite Structural Materials,”Intl. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.,7,315 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnamoorthy, K., “Internal Dynamic Stress Measurement in Model Half-spaces of Rock,”PhD Diss., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldsmith, W., Austin, C. F., Wang, C. C. andFinnegan, S.Stress Waves in Igneous Rocks,”J. Geophys. Res.,71,2055 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howe, S. P., “Macroscopic Mechanical Properties of Yule Marble,”MS Thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bloss, F. D., An Introduction to the Methods of Optical Crystallography, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brady, B. T., “The Nonlinear Mechanical Behavior of Brittle Rock. Part I, and Part II,”Intl. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.,6(3),211–225 and301–310 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, J. L., “Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Compact Bone,”PhD Diss., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1972);see also “A Split Biaxial Hopkinson-Bar for Simultaneous Torison and Compression,” Rev. Sci. Instruments, 44, 811 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davies, R. M., “A Critical Study of the Hopkinson Pressure Bar,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, A,240,375 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kenner, V. H. andGoldsmith, W., “One-Dimensional Wave Propagation through a Short Discontinuity,”J. Acoustical Soc. Amer.,45,115 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Obert, L. andDuvall, W. I., Rock Mechanics and the Design of Structures in Rock, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Project supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense and monitored by the Bureau of Mines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howe, S.P., Goldsmith, W. & Sackman, J.L. Macroscopic static and dynamic mechanical properties of Yule marble. Experimental Mechanics 14, 337–346 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323559

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323559

Keywords

Navigation