Summary
Competition for S and N was studied on free draining lysimeters seeded to associations of three annual forages on Josephine loam (Typic Haploxerults), an important soil for revegetation to rangeland production. Forage yields increased and the botanical composition shifted toward subclover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with added S. Sulfate uptake and plant S concentration were increased as a function of the S applied. Forage yields were related to plant S concentration and N:S ratios.
Subclover and filaree (Erodium botrys (Cav.) Bertol.) obtained a larger proportion of their S from fertilizer-S than did soft chess (Bromus mollis L.). Total S uptake was largely from the applied fertilizer, 39% at the intermediate S level and 78% at high S.
The replacement series design of the experiment and the use of labeled S and N permitted calculation of competition coefficients for fertilizer S, total S, soil N, and total N uptake for the species in pairwise associations. Sulfur was the factor limiting to subclover where S was not applied, and N was the limiting factor to soft chess and filaree in mixtures with subclover at high S where subclover was able to fix most of its own N. In the mixture of soft chess and filaree competition for S and N was about equally intense for both nutrients at all S levels, and filaree was dominant consistently.
Comparison of two methods for estimating the fate of fertilizer S showed that differences in sulfur uptake and leachate losses over the controls provided significantly higher values for sulfur recovery than estimates based on the fate of35S.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher C J and Ozanne P G 1966 Root growth in seedlings of annual pasture species. Plant and Soil 14, 423–436.
Allaway W H and Thompson J F 1966 Sulfur in the nutrition of plants and animals. Soil Sci. 101, 240–247.
Andrew C S 1977 The effect of sulfur on the growth, sulfur and nitrogen concentrations, and critical sulfur concentrations of some tropical and temperate pasture legumes. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28, 807–820.
Dijkshoorn W, Lampe J E M and Van Burg P F J 1960 A method of diagnosing the sulfur nutrition status of herbage. Plant and Soil 13, 227–241.
Hall R L 1974 Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. II. Nutrient relations in a NandiSetaria and GreenleafDesmodium association with particular reference to potassium. Aust. J. Ag. Res. 25, 749–756.
Jones M B 1964 Effects of sulfur on yield and sulfur uptake of various California dryland pasture species. Agron. J. 56, 235–237.
Jones M B, Martin W E and Williams W A 1968 Behavior of sulfate sulfur and elemental sulfur in three California soils in lysimeters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32, 535–540.
Jones M B, Ruckman J E, Williams W A and Koenigs R L 1980 Sulfur diagnostic criteria as affected by age and defoliation of subclover. Agron. J. 72, 1043–1046.
Martin W E 1958 Sulfur deficiency widespread in California soils. Calif. Agric. 12, 10–12.
McNaught K J and Chrisstoffels P J E 1961 Effect of sulfur deficiency on sulfur and nitrogen levels in pastures and lucerne. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 4, 177–196.
Shock C C, Jones M B, Williams W A and Center D M 1983 Effect of sulfur fertilization on three annual range species. I. Laughlin soil experiment. Agron. J. 75, 515–520.
Shock C C and Williams W A 1984 Sulfate uptake kinetics of annual forages. Agron. J. 76, 35–40.
Shock C C, Williams W A, Jones M B, Center D M and Phillips D N 1984 Nitrogen fixation by subclover associations fertilized with sulfur. Plant and Soil 81, 323–332.
Spencer K, Freney J R and Jones M B 1978 Diagnosis of sulfur efficiency in plants.In Plant Nutrition 1978. Proc. 8th Int. Coll. on Plant and Fert. Prob. Auckland. New Zealand. NZ SIR Info. Series No. 134.
Spencer K, Jones M B and Freney J R 1977 Diagnostic indices for sulfur status of subterranean clover. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28, 401–412.
Thomas V J 1970 A mathematical approach to fitting parameters in a competition model. J. Appl. Ecol. 7, 487–496.
Till A R and McCabe T P 1976 Sulfur leaching and lysimeter characterization. Soil Sci. 121, 44–47.
Wit C T de 1960 On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. The Hague. 66(8), 1–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution of the University of California Hopland Field Station and Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shock, C.C., Jones, M.B., Williams, W.A. et al. Competition for S and N by associations of three annual range species in lysimeters. Plant Soil 81, 311–321 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323046
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323046