Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of automatic classification methods applied to lake geochemical samples

  • Published:
Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geochemical samples from part of Lake Geneva were analyzed for 29oxides and trace elements. The variables and samples were subjected to R- and Q-mode analyses. The following techniques were applied in sequence: data transformation (normalization and standardization), data reduction (principal component and factor analysis), and automatic classification (dendrograph). The data were treated using various combinations of these techniques, and the resulting classifications evaluated by means of several criteria. The best classification of the samples is given by a cluster analysis performed on four principal components computed from standardized variables. The discriminatory power of the variables also was measured and determined to depend on their degree of intercorrelation. As a final result, the 29original variables were reduced to four components and the sediment samples classified into four facies, leading to easily interpretable geochemical maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W., 1958, An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 374 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergonier, H., 1973, Méthodes d'analyse de données pour la détection et la description de structures: Etudes et Recherches no. 3, Dept. of Political Sciences, Univ. of Geneva, 95 p.

  • Blackith, R. E., and Reyment, R. A., 1971, Multivariate morphometrics: Academic Press, London, 412 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1967, FORTRAN IV program for Q-mode analysis of nonquantitative data using IBM 7090/7094 computers: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 17, 28 p.

  • Boyce, A. J., 1969, Mapping diversity: a comparative study of some numerical methods,in Numerical taxonomy: Academic Press, London, p. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, E. M., 1967, A computer programme for factor analysis of geochemical and other data: Geol. Surv. of Canada, Paper 67–34, 42 p.

  • Cattell, R. B., 1965, Factor analysis: an introduction to essentials. (I) The purpose and underlying models. (II) The role of factor analysis in research: Biometrics, v. 21, p. 190–215; p. 405–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuau, C., and Freyssenet, M., 1968, L'analyse typologique d'une aire métropolitaine: Ministère de l'équipement et du logement, service technique central d'aménagement et d'urbanisme, Paris, 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davaud, E., 1973, VARIANC1: unpubl. programme, Dépt. de géologie de l'Université de Genève.

  • Davis, J. C., 1973, Statistics and data analysis in geology: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 550 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirmen, F., 1969, Multivariate procedures and FORTRAN IV program for evaluation and improvement of classifications: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 31, 51 p.

  • Demirmen, F., 1972, Mathematical search procedures in facies modeling in sedimentary rocks,in Mathematical models of sedimentary processes: Plenum Press, New York, p. 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirmen, F., 1973, A semiobjective method for condensing classifications: Jour. Math. Geology, v. 5, no. 3, p. 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhausen, P. H., 1970, Ordination of sediments from the Cape Hatteras continental margin: Jour. Math. Geology, v. 2, no. 2, p. 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C., 1966, Some distances properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis: Biometrika, v. 53, p. 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H., 1967, Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.): The Univ. of Chicago Press, 474 p.

  • Isnard, P., 1970, Analyse statistique multivariable des données géochimiques par traitement automatique: Sciences de la Terre, v. 15, no. 2, p. 103–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquet, J.-M., 1973, Definition de microfaciès par classification automatique et comparaisons des descripteurs: Arch. Sc. Genève, v. 26, no. 2, p. 137–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N., and Sibson, R., 1971, Mathematical taxonomy: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 286 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulbicki, G., and Sourisse, C., 1968, Aspect actuel du traitement sur ordinateur des données géochimiques au CRP: Bull. Centre Rech. SNPA, v. 2, no. 1.

  • Kaiser, H. G., 1962, Formulae for component scores: Psychometrika, v. 27, p. 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., and Fénelon, J. P., 1971, Statistique et informatique appliquées: Dunod, Paris, 426 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, R. B., 1968, The dendrograph: a new tool for correlation: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 79, no. 11, p. 1663–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, R. B., and Wenninger, R. G., 1970, The dendrograph: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 48, 28 p.

  • Matalas, N. C., and Reiher, B. J., 1967, Some comments on the use of factor analysis: Water Resources Res., v. 3, no. 1, p. 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, J. M., 1969a, Multivariate facies maps,in Symposium on computer applications in petroleum exploration: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 40, p. 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, J. M., 1969b, Classification of mixed-mode data by R-mode factor analysis and Q-mode cluster analysis on distance function,in Numerical taxonomy: Academic Press, London, p. 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, J. M., 1970, FORTRAN IV program for Q-mode cluster analysis on distance function with printed dendrogram: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 46, 42 p.

  • Rao, C. R., 1952, Advanced statistical methods in biometric research: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 390 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. M., 1969, The application of cluster and discriminatory analysis in mapping granite intrusions: Lithos, v. 2, p. 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., 1967, Correlated characters in numerical taxonomy: System. Zool., v. 16, p. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., and Sokal, R. R., 1965, Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy: Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., v. 45, p. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A., 1963, Principles of numerical taxonomy: W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 359 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. L., Kemp, A. L. W., and Lewis, C. F. M., 1972, Distribution, composition and characteristics of the surficial sediments of Lake Ontario: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 42, no. 1, p. 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernet, J.-P., Thomas, R. L., Jaquet, J.-M., and Friedli, R., 1972, Texture of the sediments of the Petit Lac (Western Lake Geneva): Eclog. Geol. Helv., v. 65, no. 3, p. 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernet, J.-P., and Thomas, R. L., 1972, The occurrence and distribution of mercury in the sediments of the Petit Lac (Western Lake Geneva): Eclog. Geol. Helv., v. 65, no. 2, p. 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstedt, W. C., and Davis, J. C., 1968, FORTRAN IV program for computation and display of principal components: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 21, 27 p.

  • Wishart, D., 1969, FORTRAN II programs for 8 methods of cluster analysis (CLUSTAN I): Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 38, 112 p.

  • Wolleben, J. A., Pauken, R. J., and Dearien, J. A., 1968, FORTRAN IV program for multivariate paleontologic analysis using an IBM System/360 model 40 computer: Kansas Geol. Survey Computer Contr. 20, p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaquet, J.M., Froidevaux, R. & Vernet, J.P. Comparison of automatic classification methods applied to lake geochemical samples. Mathematical Geology 7, 237–266 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312723

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02312723

Key words

Navigation