Skip to main content
Log in

A theory of reciprocal gifts

  • Articles
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropologists and sociologists have long emphasized the concept of generalized reciprocity and symbolic value of gifts. When gifts are given in primitive or modern societies, symbolic meanings of gifts are taken into account and the gift recipients feel obliged to return the favor. In the field of economics, several papers in recent years have emphasized the value of gifts as signaling toools or as expressions of altruism. However, these papers do not address the issue of symbolic value of gifts. This paper discusses how symbolic value of a gift can be determined and how it is related to the concept of generalized reciprocity. A Nash game is used to show how symbolic values may be determined in a model of generalized reciprocal gifts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving,”The Economic Journal, 100, 1990, pp. 464–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S.; Herbert, G. “Origins of Human Cooperation,” chapter fromGenetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, edited by P. Hammerstein, The MIT Press, Boston: Mass, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Homo Reciprocans: Altruistic Publishment of Free Riders,”Nature, 415, 10, 2002, pp. 125–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. “Gifts as Economic Signals and Social Symbols,”American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1988, S180-S214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, H. L.; Macleod, W. B. “Gift Giving and the Evolution of Cooperation,”International Economic Review, 38, 3, 1997, pp. 485–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, F.; Gächter, S. “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 2000, pp. 159–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. “The Norm of Reciprocity,”American Sociological Review, 25, 1960, pp. 161–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, O.The Gift of the Magi and Other Short Stories, New York: Dover Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, E. “Symbolic Products: Prestige, Pride, and Identity Goods,”Theory and Decision, 49, 1, August 2000, pp. 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S. C. “The Logic of Good Social Relations,”Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71, 2, June 2000, 171–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B.Argonauts of the Western Pacific, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H.Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, W. “Theoretical Considerations on Negotiated Tariff Adjustments,”Oxford Economic Papers, 33, 1981, pp. 135–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffle, B. J.; Kaplan, T. R. “Here's Something You Never Asked For, Didn't Know Existed, and Can't Easily Obtain,” Working Paper, Ben-Gurion University, 2001.

  • Solow, J. “Paternalistic Preferences, Interpersonal Transfers, and Reciprocity,”Southern Economic Journal, October, 61, 2, 1994, pp. 379–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O.Altruism and Beyond: An Economic Analysis of Transfers and Exchanges Within Families, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions,”The Economic Journal, 94, 1984, pp. 772–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, J. “The Demand for Social Approval and Status as a Motivation to Give,”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 158, 2002, pp. 464–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Purkayastha, D. A theory of reciprocal gifts. Atlantic Economic Journal 32, 312–319 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02304236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02304236

Keywords

Navigation