Skip to main content
Log in

Prostate cancer screening: Role of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to determine the efficacy of digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for early detection of prostate cancer in men ≥50 years of age.

Methods: A prospective single-center clinical trial was conducted to screen 644 asymptomatic men, who were elicited by newspaper and radio advertisements, with DRE and PSA. Quadrant biopsy examinations of the prostate were performed if PSA >4 ng/ml or if DRE was suspicious.

Results: Thirty-seven percent of the men (n=241) had an abnormality of DRE or elevated PSA. Of the 163 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound and quadrant biopsies of the prostate, 77% had normal biopsies, 14 (8%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and 24 (15%) had carcinoma of the prostate. PSAs ranged from 0.3 to 65.5 ng/ml, with a mean of 2.35 and a median of 1.6. Ninety-five patients had a PSA >4 ng/ml, of whom 17 had a PSA >10 ng/ml. Sensitivity of PSA was 75% and specificity 87%; for DRE the sensitivity was 75% and the specificity 69%. Clinical stage of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was B1 in 15 and B2 in five. Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) had organ-confined disease; the other five had specimen-confined disease. No patient was found to have nodal involvement.

Conclusion: The combination of PSA and DRE seems to improve the stage of diagnosis of patients with prostate cancer. Larger, randomized studies will be necessary to evaluate the effect of screening on overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer Statistics, 1993.CA 1993;43:7–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee F, Gray JM, McCleary RD, et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: echogenicity, histopatology and staging.Prostate 1985;7:117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watson RA, Tang DB. The predictive value of prostatic acid phosphatase as a screening test for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med 1980;303:497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oesterling JE. Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.J Urol 1991;145:907–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chodak GW, Keller P, Schoenberg HW. Assessment of screening for prostate cancer using the digital rectal examination.J Urol 1989;141:1136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson IM, Ernst JJ, Gangai N, Spence CR. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of routine urological screening.J Urol 1984;132:690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med 1991;324:1156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooner WH, Moseley BR, Rutherford CL, et al. Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen.J Urol 1990;143:1146–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stamey TA, Fraeiha FS, McNeal JE, et al. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.J Urol 1992;147:303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richie, J.P., Kavoussi, L.R., Ho, G.T. et al. Prostate cancer screening: Role of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen. Annals of Surgical Oncology 1, 117–120 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303554

Key Words

Navigation