Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we explored the use of log files as a window into the process of hypermedia navigation. Although there is a growing body of research addressing theoretical and design issues related to open-ended, non-directive technologies such as hypermedia, relatively few studies have attempted to explain navigational performance. Sixty-six undergraduate students used a multidimensional, computer-based kiosk that could be explored in a nonlinear fashion to find information in response to one of two information-retrieval tasks (simple or complex). Cluster analysis was used to generate performance profiles derived from navigational data captured in log files. Analyses of within-cluster performance profiles, combined with external validation criteria, led to the classification of four different types of navigational performance (models users, disenchanted volunteers, feature explorers, and cyber cartographers). These characterizations were consistent with information-retrieval scores and the external criteria (self-efficacy, perceived utility, and interest). For example, individuals who appeared to take the time to learn the layout of the kiosk also had the highest self-efficacy, while those who used the help screen and watched the most movies had the lowest self-efficacy. Results also demonstrated an interaction between various individual navigational profiles and type of information-retrieval task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P.A., Kulikowich, J.M., & Jetton, T.L. (1994). The role of subject matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts.Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. S., & Otto, R. G. (1996). Media as lived environments: The ecological psychology of Educational Technology. D. Jonassen (Ed.),The Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 199–226). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1993).Profiles of hypertext readers: Results from the electrotext project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Anderson-Inman, L., Horney, M. A., Chen, D-T., & Lewin, L. (1994). Hypertext literacy: Observations from the ElectroText project.Language Arts, 71, 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., Young, M. F., & Owen, S. V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches.Instructional Science, 24(5), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Fajen, B. R., Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (1996). Assessing hypertext navigation through Pathfinder: Prospects and limitations.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(3), 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. A., & Dwyer, D. A. (1994). Using hypermedia to provide learner control.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowdish, B. E., Barab, S. A., & Lawless, K. A. (1994, October).Assessment of situated learning: Exploring a method of seamless assessment in situ. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.

  • Cleave, J. B., Edelson, D., & Beckwith, R. (1993, March).A matter of style: An analysis of student interactions with a computer-based learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey.IEEE Computer, 2(9), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1994). A framework for the study of hypertext.Instructional Science, 22(3), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R. S. (1990). The role of hypermedia in education: A look at the research issues.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(4), 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, K. (1988). Multimedia in education. In S. Ambron and K. Hooper (Eds.),Interactive multimedia. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, M. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The Electro Text project: Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(1), 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Designing structured hypermedia and structuring access to hypermedia.Educational Technology, 28(11), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning.Educational Technology, 31(9), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., & Berdel, R. L. (1990). Design and use of hypermedia systems.Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(3), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-inaction with open-ended learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis.Journal of Educational Computing Research.14(4), 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos.Educational Technology, 28(11), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (1989). Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(1), 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1975). Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions.AV Communications Review, 23, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1987). Methodology review: Clustering methods.Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misanchuk, R. R., & Schwier, R. A. (1992). Representing interactive multimedia and hypermedia audit trails.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1(3), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, J. (1990). The art of navigating in hypermedia.Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1990).SPSS base system user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. J., Hall, E. P., & Halgren, T. L. (1996). Toward an on-line assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing an doing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies.Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1995).Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.),Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3 (pp. 13–44). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotsberger, P. (1996). Instructional uses of the World Wide Web.Educational Technology, 36(2), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, H., & Brown, S. W. (1995). Learner-control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisk instruction.International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the non-linear and multi-dimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, education, multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. R. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(4), 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., Schraw, G., Buxton, W. M., & Hayes, M. T. (1993). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategies and recall.Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., Gupta, L., & Nesbit, J. (1994). Exploring individual differences in studying strategies using graph theoretic statistics.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40(2), 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension.Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F. & McNeese, M. D. (1995). A situated cognition approach to problem solving. In P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caid, & K. Vicente (Eds.),Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems: Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tulane University, USA

    Bruce E. Bowdish

  2. Utah State University, USA

    Kimberly A. Lawless

  3. Department of Instructional Systems Technology, Indiana University, Rm. 2232, 201 N. Rose Ave., 47405, Bloomington, IN

    Sasha A. Barab

Authors
  1. Sasha A. Barab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce E. Bowdish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kimberly A. Lawless
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sasha A. Barab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barab, S.A., Bowdish, B.E. & Lawless, K.A. Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. ETR&D 45, 23–41 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299727

Keywords

Search

Navigation