Skip to main content
Log in

Technology professional development for teachers

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines technology professional development for preservice and inservice teachers. It reviews the current status of technology in our schools, what we know about professional development in the area of technology, and research on efforts to increase preservice teacher use of technology in appropriate ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balli, S.J., Wright, M.D., & Foster, P.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology.Educational Technology, 37(1), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use.Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey. Report #1. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine. Available online: http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/internet-use/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M.K., & Mitchell, J.W. (1996). Ed tech in teacher education: Curricular space required.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3/4), 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, L.K. (1997). Technology-supported change: A staff development opportunity.NAASP Bulletin, 81(593), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, G.A. (1998). What research says: Training teachers for using technology.Journal of Staff Development, 19(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., & Kopp, T.W. (1990). Technology and teacher education. In W.R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education, (pp. 498–513). N.Y.: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, D.L., & Ritchie, D.C. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: A model of staff development for implementing technology in schools.Contemporary Education, 63(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes, L. (1997). From sages to guides: A professional development study.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (1996). The Internet as an educational innovation: Lessons from experience with computer implementation.Educational Technology, 36(6), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (1997).Study of school uses of television and video. Alexandria, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1995). Computers meet classrooms: Classroom wins.Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dywer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned.Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1996).The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C., Dwyer, D.C., & Yocam, K. (1996).Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M.G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991).The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K.C., & Gilbert, S.W. (1995). Great expectations.Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(2), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, M.G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators.Computers and Education, 20(2), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. (1997). Imagine the possibilities: The world at your fingertips. In P. Burness & W. Snider (Eds.).Learn & live (pp. 212–215). Nicasio, CA: The George Lucas Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hignite, M., & Echternact, L. (1992). Assessment of the relationships between computer attitudes and computer literacy levels of prospective educators.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., & Henriquez, A. (1993). Telecommunications and K-12 educators: Findings from a national survey. New York: Bank Street College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. (1974).The politics of educational innovation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, D. (1994). Teaching technology to teachers.Educational Leadership, 51(7), 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1983).Power in staff development through research on training. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988).Student achievement through staff development. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995).Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalchick, A. (1997). Technology portfolios as instructional strategy: Designing a reflexive approach to preservice technology training.Tech-Trends, 42(4), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, R.B., Liu, X., & Timmons, V. (1997). Teachers, computers, and the Internet: The first stage of a community-initiated project for the integration of technology into the curriculum.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkiewicz, H. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, M., & Davidson, G.S. (1998).Leadership in instructional technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, M., & Simonson, M.R. (1993). The reduction of computer anxiety: Its relation to relaxation training, previous computer coursework, achievement, and need for cognition.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 295–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlinger, H.D. (1997, June). The next step.Electronic School, A22–A24.

  • Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999).Information technology in teacher education. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (1999).Teacher quality: A report on teacher preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997).Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington, D.C: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1995).Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, D.N. (1987). Why school reform doesn't change schools: Political and organizational perspectives. In W.L. Boyd & C.T. Kerchner (Eds.),The politics of excellence and choice in education, (pp. 143–152). New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective.American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B. (1995). Teaching teachers to change: The place of change theory in the technology education of teachers.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 3(2/3), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995).Diffusion of innovations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B. (1982).The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B. (1990).The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L. (1993). Tales from the trenches: Educators' perspective on technology implementation.Journal of Teacher Education and Technology, 1(4), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L. (1994). First steps into the information age: Technology infusion in a teacher education program.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 10(4), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L. (1995). Educators and the Internet: A case study of professional development.Computers and Education, 24(3), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L. (1997). Rural telecommunication for educational professional development and instructional improvement: Two federally funded models.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3/4), 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L., & Dehoney, J. (1998). Meeting the future: A teacher education program joins the information age.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrum, L., & Fitzgerald, M.A. (1996). A challenge for the information age: Educators and the Internet.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(2/3), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, J.O. (1998). Factors that affect the adoption and use of electronic mail by K-12 foreign language educators.Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (1995). The state of teacher training: The results of the first national survey of technology staff development in schools.Electronic Learning, 14(8), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.A., Houston, W.R., & Robin, B.R. (1995). Policy and leadership: Preparing preservice teachers to use technology in the classroom.Learning and Leading with Technology, 22(4), 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler, N.B., McKinney, M.O., & Jones, W.P. (1995). Integrating technology into teacher education courses: Longitudinal perspectives on overcoming impediments.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 11(3), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlmann, J., & Taylor, H.G. (1998). Analyzing the impact of telecommunications on learning outcomes in elementary classrooms.Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 9(1), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, K. (1996). Innovations in integrating technology into student teaching experiences.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(2), 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, K., & McLean, S.V. (1997). Early childhood teacher preparation: A tale of authors and multimedia, a model of technology integration described.Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8(1), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J., Austin, L., & Willis, D. (1994).Information technology in teacher education: Surveys of the current status (A report prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment). Houston, TX: University of Houston, College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J.W., & Mehlinger, H.D. (1996). Information technology and teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed., pp. 978–1029). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, D.F. (1998). Introduction to computer-mediated communication: A master syllabus for teaching communication technology.Communication Education, 47(2), 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H.F. (1977).Teachers vs. technocrats. Eugene, Oregon: Center for Educational Policy and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, S., & Eklund, J. (1997). A case study of communication technology within the elementary school.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 144–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammit, S.A. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools.Educational Research, 34(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schrum, L. Technology professional development for teachers. ETR&D 47, 83–90 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299599

Keywords

Navigation