Skip to main content
Log in

Tax evasion as ade facto vote of disapproval of PAC contributions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, it is hypothesized that higher (rising) real PAC election campaign contributions may lead the public to increasingly distrust and resent politicians because of the perceived political influence that these contributions exercise. It is further hypothesized that to express that distrust and resentment, the public may make greater efforts to evade income taxation so as to deny tax revenues to the Treasury and “influence-peddling” politicians. Instrumenatal Variable (IV) estimates in first differences that allow for income tax rates, IRS audit rates, IRS penalty assessments on detected unreported income, and the public's dissatisfaction with government per se, find strong, albeit only preliminary, empirical evidence that tax evasion is an increasing function of real PAC election campaign contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M. M.; Cecil, H. W.; Knoblett, J. A. “The Effects of Tax Rates and Enforcement Policies on Taxpayer Compliance: A Study of Self-Employed Taxpayers,”Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 29, 2001, pp. 186–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J.; Jackson, B.; McKee, M. “Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance,”American Economic Review, Vol. 82, 1992, pp.1018–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, F. J. “Macroeconomic Time Series and the Monetary Aggregates Approach to Estimating the Underground Economy,”Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 6, 1999, pp. 609–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D.; Wright, J. “Counteractive Lobbying,”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 88, 1994, pp. 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, J. C. “Income Tax Evasion and the Tax Schedule: Some Experimental Results,”Public Finance/Finances Publiques, Vol. 42, 1987, pp. 357–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y.; Maital, S. “Optimal Tax Evasion and Optimal Tax Evasion Policy: Behavioral Aspects,” in W. Gaertner and A. Wenig (Eds.),The Economics of the Shadow Economy, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M.; Tullock, G.The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula, R. J. “An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Government Tax and Auditing Policies on the Size of the Underground Economy: The Case of the United States,”The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 56, 1997, pp. 173–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Impact of Income-Detection Technology and Other Factors on Aggregate Income Tax Evasion: The Case of the United States,”Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Vol. 53, 2001, 401–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T. “Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65, 1983, 363–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, C.; LaBand, D. N. “Expressiveness and Voting,”Public Choice, Vol. 110, 2002, 351–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Economic Advisors.Economic Report of the President, 2002, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, E. L.The Underground Economies: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “The Underground Economy and the Currency Enigma,”Public Finance/Finances Publiques, Vol. 49, 1994, pp. 119–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Overseas Holdings of U.S. Currency and the Underground Economy,” in S. Pozo, ed.,Exploring the Underground Economy, Kalmazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internal Revenue Service.Annual Report of the Commissioner and Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, various.

  • --.Data Book, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, various.

  • Kroszner, R. S.; Stratmann, T. “Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services' Political Action Committees,”American Economic Review, Vol. 88, 1998, pp. 1163–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, C. “Finance Industry PAC Contributions to U.S. Senators, 1983–88,”Public Choice, Vol. 89, 1996, pp. 219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. “Inflation and the Size of the Underground Economy: Analysis for 1962–1980 with the Tanzi Data,”Academy of Economics and Finance Proceedings, Vol. 21, 1997, pp. 407–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteghini, P. M. “Tax Evasion and Entrepreneurial Flexibility,”Public Finance Review, Vol. 28, 2000, pp. 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestieau, P.; Possen, U.; Slutsky, S. “Optimal Differential Taxes and Penalties,”Public Finance/Finances Publiques, Vol. 49, 1994, pp. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. W.; Weck-Hannemann, H. “Tax Rates, Tax Administration and Income Tax Evasion in Switzerland,” Paper presented at the Conference of the Applied Econometrics Association, Rome, Italy, 1989.

  • Saltz, I. S. “An Empirical Note on Tax Auditing and the Size of the Underground Economy in the United States, 1962–1980,”International Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 48, 2001, pp. 119–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. B. “An Empirical Test for Tax Evasion,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, 1985, pp. 232–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. M. Jr. “Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 1990, pp. 1195–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, T. “How Reelection Constituencies Matter: Evidence from Political Action Committees' Contributions and Congressional Voting,”Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 39, 1996, pp. 603–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. “The Underground Economy in the United States: Annual Estimates, 1930–80,” in M.S. Khan and R. Zahler,The Underground Economy in the United States and Abroad, Lexington: Lexington Books, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. “A Pure Theory of Public Expenditures,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64, 1956, pp. 416–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G.The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking, Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— “Public Decisions as Public Goods,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, 1971, pp. 913–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau.Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1978, 1982, 1985, 1989, 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978, 1982, 1985, 1989, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,”Econometrica, Vol. 48, 1980, pp. 817–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • www.taxfoundation.org/prtopincometable.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to Jim Alm, Mike McKee, Joel Slemrod, and Thomas Stratmann and to the University of Miami Economics Seminar faculty and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Economics Seminar faculty for ideas and helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebula, R.J. Tax evasion as ade facto vote of disapproval of PAC contributions. Atlantic Economic Journal 31, 338–347 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298492

Keywords

Navigation