Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was an investigation of the effects of learner control and of advisement in a hypertext learning environment with second-grade students who had different levels of prior knowledge about the content. Four treatment conditions crossing two variables, learner control (free access representing network structuring of hypertext vs. limited access representing hierarchical structuring of hypertext), and advisement (advisement vs. no-advisement), were established. From the quantitative and qualitative data, results indicated that: (a) for low prior knowledge (PK) students, the limited-access condition was more effective than the free-access condition, whereas high-PK students were able to function equally well in both conditions; (b) the free-access group reported a higher positive attitude for advisement than for no advisement, but the limited-access group showed no such difference in preference; (c) the low-PK group completed the lesson more quickly without advisement than with advisement, whereas the high-PK group's completion times did not vary across advisement conditions; and (d) analysis of the path data indicated that advisement was helpful in preventing disorientation in the free-access condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge.Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman, L. (1989). Electronic studying: Information organizers to help students to study “better” not “harder” - part 2.The Computer Teacher, 16(9), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balson, P. M., Manning, D. T., Ebner, D. G., & Brooks, F. R. (1984–85). Instructor-controlled versus student-controlled training in a videodisc-based paramedical program.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 13(2), 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belland, J. C., Taylor, W. D., Canelos, J., Dwyer, F., & Baker, P. (1985). Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences?Educational Communications & Technology Journal, 33(3), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, D., & Tsai, C. (1990). HyperCard in educational research: An introduction and case study.Educational Technology, 30(2), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. (1984). Do learners make good choices?Instructor Innovator, 29(2), 15–17, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coorough, R. P. (1991, February).The effects of program control, learner control and learner control with advisement lesson control strategies on anxiety and learning from computer-assisted instruction. Paper presented in Association for Educational Communications & Technology Conference, Orlando, Florida.

  • Estes, W. K. (1988). Toward a framework for combining connectionist and symbol-processing models.Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene, J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. P. (1972). Interactive relationship between inquisitiveness and student control of instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(5), 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 225–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G., Trumbull, D., & Smith, J. (1988). Perceptions of control and use of control options in computer-assisted video instruction.Tech Trends, 33(5), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, M. G., Garner, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Sawyer, R. (1989). Children's control of computer-based reading assistance in answering synthesis questions.Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning.Journal of Memory and Learning, 27, 166–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzfried, L., & Hannafin, M. J. (1985). The effect of the locus of CAI control strategies on the learning of mathematics rules.American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, S. H. (1990).Exploring hypertext programming: Writing knowledge representation and problem-solving programs. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Windcrest Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, H., Mohr, H., & Wenzel, A. (1988). Students' attitudes towards control methods in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 4, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N., Robson, E. H., & Steward, A. P. (1985). Learner control in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer Assisted Instruction, 1, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, K. J., & Tennyson, R. D. (1983). Effects of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task.Educational Communications & Technology Journal, 31(4), 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design.Educational Psychologist, 21(4), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext.Educational Technology, 28(11), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1992, February).Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Paper presented in Association for Educational Communications & Technology Conference, Washington, D.C.

  • Kinzie, M. B., & Sullivan, H. J. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control and CAI.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Keller, J. M. (1990). Influence of student ability, locus of control, and type of instructional control on performance and confidence.Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A., & Roselli, T. (1991). Effects of the hypertextual approach versus the structured approach on students' achievement.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(2), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. M. (1984). Interactive video and the control of learning.Educational Technology, 24(6), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. S. (1989). Neural network principles for theoretical psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21(2), 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and instruction.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(4), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & PDP Research Group (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milheim, W. D. (1990). The effects of pacing and sequence control in an interactive video lesson.Educational and Training Technology International, 27(1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misanchuk, E. R., & Schwier, R. (1991, February).Interactive media audit trails: Approaches and issues. Paper presented in Association for Educational Communications & Technology Conference, Orlando, Florida.

  • Morariu, J. (1988). Hypermedia in instruction and training: The power and the promise.Educational Technology, 28(11), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics.Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, J. (1990).Hypertext and hypermedia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, O. (1991). Hypermedia: Functional features and research issues.Educational Technology, 31(8), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Rakow, E. A. (1981). Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules.Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 745–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & O'Dell, J. K. (1989). Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(4), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1982). The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In W. Otto & S. White (Eds.),Reading expository material (pp. 13–48). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B., & Kearsley, G. (1989).Hypertext hands on! Reading, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. (1989). Applying hypermedia for performance improvement.Performance & Instruction, 28(6), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 525–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the College of Education, University of Texas at El Paso, USA

    E. Christine Shin

  2. the University of Texas at Austin, USA

    Diane L. Schallert

  3. Arizona State University, USA

    Wilhelmina C. Savenye

Authors
  1. E. Christine Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diane L. Schallert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilhelmina C. Savenye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, E.C., Schallert, D.L. & Savenye, W.C. Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment. ETR&D 42, 33–46 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298169

Keywords

Search

Navigation