Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much published research focuses on the benefits of learning in small groups. However, little research has differentiated small-group learning methods or considered the implications of related research for designing instructional software. In this article, the origins of small-group learning are traced, and one method, cooperative learning, is distinguished from other small-group learning methods. The instructional and social benefits of cooperative learning are examined and theoretical explanations for the effects of grouping are presented. Finally, issues relevant to designing instructional software for cooperative learning are examined and suggestions for future research are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlum-Heath, M. E., & DiVesta, F. J. (1986). The effect of conscious controlled verbalization of a cognitive strategy on transfer in problem solving.Memory and Cognition, 14, 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954).Nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaria, R. P., Biran, L. A., & Leith, G. O. (1969). Individual versus co-operative learning.Educational Research, 11, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978).The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, W. E., & Lemke, E. A. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior.Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (1986). Our national report card: Preliminary results from the new Johns Hopkins' study.Classroom Computer Learning, 6(4), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1991). Educational psychology and psychological expertise: New findings and new opportunities for thinking about training.Educational Psychologist, 26, 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, N. T., Stephan, C., Rosenfield, D., Aronson, E., & Sikes, J. (1977). Interdependence in the classroom: A field study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, A. (1987). The potential for interactive technology.Byte, 12(2), 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. A., & Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Adapting courseware to accommodate individual differences. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),Instructional designs for instructional courseware (pp. 203–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. A., & Sales, G. C. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition of concepts in a computer-based instructional lesson.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. A., & Williams, M. D. (1988). A test of one learner-control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence.American Educational Research Journal, 25, 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrier, G. O. (1972). Cog's ladder: A model of group development.Advanced Management Journal, 37(1), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1986).Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1991, April).Clasroom management and classroom management. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Cooper, L., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Wilderson, F. (1980). The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic experiences on interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous pairs.Journal of Social Psychology, 111, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. W., Hannafin, M. J., & Hooper, S. (1989). The effects of individual versus cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (1983). The future of computers in education: The likely evolution of computer use in the schools.Educational Leadership, 40, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durling, R., & Shick, C. (1976). Concept attainment by pairs and individuals as a function of vocalization.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Smith, E. C. (1962). A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem solving and children's planning skills.Developmental Psychology, 29, 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, R. L., Hathaway, C., & Wodarski, J. S. (1971). Group contingencies, peer tutoring, and accelerating academic achievement. In E. Ramp & W. Hopkins, (Eds.),A new direction for education: Behavior analysis (pp. 41–53). Lawrence, KA: The University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell, S., & Slavin, R. E. (1981). Cooperative learning and the structure of interracial friendships.Sociology of Education, 54, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. (1992). The effects of peer interaction on learning during computer-based mathematics instruction.Journal of Educational Research, 85, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 31(3), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., Ward, T. W., Hannafin, M. J., & Clark, H. T. (1989). Factors influencing small group learning in a college age population.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoska, D. M., & Hooper, S. (1992).Effects of effort advisement on learner-perspective in computer-based instruction. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Hythecker, V. I., Dansereau, D. F., & Rocklin, T. R. (1988). An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environment.Educational Psychologist, 23, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (1982). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education.Educational Researcher, 10, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987).Learning together and alone (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1988).Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989).Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1986).Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals.Review of Educational Research, 53, 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1986). Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.American Educational Research Journal, 23, 382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1991, February). Group grade grubbing versus cooperative learning.Educational Leadership, 83–87.

  • Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning.Review of Educational Research, 58, 59–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., O'Donnell, A., Hythecker, V., Lambiotte, J. G., & Rocklin, T. R. (1984). Verbal ability and cooperative learning: Transfer of effects.Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1986). Four cognitive principles of learning-strategy instruction.Educational Psychologist, 21, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, B. A., Larson, C. O., Dansereau, D. F., & Spurlin, J. E. (1985). Cooperative dyads: Impact on text learning and transfer.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKellar, N. A. (1986). Behaviors used in peer tutoring.Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965).The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926).The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (1987). Instructional technology: A history. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 11–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & DiVesta, F. J. (1976). Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 689–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardello, R. (1984). The technological threat to education.Teachers College Record, 85, 631–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change.Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations.Review of Educational Research, 50, 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlechter, T. M. (1990). The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer-based training.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning.Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1983a).Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1983b). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1979). School practices that improve race relations.American Educational Research Journal, 16, 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, H., Pascarella, E. T., & Ford, S. (1984). The influence of cooperative learning strategies on teacher practices, student perceptions of the learning environment, and academic achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 21, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, W. C., Zander, A. E., Morse, W. C., & Jenkins, D. H. (1950). Psychology of group behavior: The class as a group.Journal of Educational Psychology, 41, 322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, J. (1991, April).Age and gender as moderators of the effects of peer collaboration. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L. (1982).Peer teaching: Historical perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982a). Peer interaction and learning in small cooperative groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 642–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982b). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982c). Student interaction and learning in small groups.Review of Educational Research, 52, 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1988, April).Peer interaction and learning in small groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Webb, N. M., & Kenderski, C. M. (1984). Student interaction and learning in small-group and whole-class settings. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.),The social context of education (pp. 153–170). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, R. H., Wiser, P. L., & Cook, S. W. (1975). The impact of cooperative learning experiences on cross-ethnic relations and attitudes.Journal of Social Issues, 31(1), 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, S. (1981). The effectiveness of cooperative learning teams for increasing cross-ethnic friendship: Additional evidence.Human Organization, 40, 264–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the College of Education, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Simon Hooper

Authors
  1. Simon Hooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Thanks are extended to Jim Klein for his review of an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooper, S. Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. ETR&D 40, 21–38 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296840

Keywords

Search

Navigation