Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian inference for graphical factor analysis models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We generalize factor analysis models by allowing the concentration matrix of the residuals to have nonzero off-diagonal elements. The resulting model is named graphical factor analysis model. Allowing a structure of associations gives information about the correlation left unexplained by the unobserved variables, which can be used both in the confirmatory and exploratory context. We first present a sufficient condition for global identifiability of this class of models with a generic number of factors, thereby extending the results in Stanghellini (1997) and Vicard (2000). We then consider the issue of model comparison and show that fast local computations are possible for this purpose, if the conditional independence graphs on the residuals are restricted to be decomposable and a Bayesian approach is adopted. To achieve this aim, we propose a new reversible jump MCMC method to approximate the posterior probabilities of the considered models. We then study the evolution of political democracy in 75 developing countries based on eight measures of democracy in two different years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1994). Bayes' theorem in latent variable modelling. In P.R. Freeman & A.F.M. Smith (Eds.),Aspects of uncertainty: A tribute to D.V. Lindley (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H., & Shigemasu, K. (1998). Bayesian factor analysis model and choosing the number of factors using a new informational complexity criterion. In A. Rizzi, M. Vichi, & H. Bock (Eds.),Advances in data science and classification (pp. 335–342). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W. (1980). Factor analysis of multiple batteries by maximum likelihood.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1993). Linear dependencies represented by chain graphs.Statistical Science, 8, 204–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1994). Tests for linearity, multivariate normality and the adequacy of linear scores.Applied Statistics, 43, 347–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1996).Multivariate dependencies. Models analysis and interpretation. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (2000).A sweep operator for triangular matrices and its statistical applications (ZUMA Research Rep. 00-04). Mannheim, Germany: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P., & Lauritzen, S.L. (1993). Hyper Markow Laws in the statistical analysis of decomposable graphical models.Annals of Statistics, 21, 1272–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1995).Introduction to graphical modelling. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2000).Introduction to graphical modelling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg, M., & Lauritzen, S.L. (1989). Decomposition of maximum likelihood in mixed graphical interaction models.Biometrika, 76, 539–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, P., & Green, P.J. (1999). Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian decomposable graphical Gaussian model determination.Biometrika, 84, 785–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.J. (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination.Biometrika, 82, 711–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L. (1996).Graphical models. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes H., & West, M. (1998).Model uncertainty in factor analysis (ISDS Discussion Paper 98-38). Durham, NC: Duke University, Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1998). Graphs, causality and structural equation models.Sociological Methods and Research, 27, 226–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, S.J. & Shigemasu, K. (1989). Bayesian Inference in Factor Analysis. In L.J. Gleser, M.D. Perlman, S.J. Press, & A.R. Sampson (Eds.),Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honour of Ingram Olkin (271–287). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S., & Green, P.J. (1997). On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 59, 731–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, E. (1997). Identification of a single-factor model using graphical Gaussian rules.Biometrika, 84, 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicard, P. (2000). On the identification of a single-factor model with correlated residuals.Biometrika, 87, 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1923). The Theory of path coefficients: a reply to Niles' criticism.Genetics, 8, 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients.Annals of Statistics, 5, 161–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Stanghellini.

Additional information

We acknowledge support from M.U.R.S.T. of Italy and from the European Science Foundation H.S.S.S. Network. We are grateful to the referees and the Editor for many useful suggestions and comments which led to a substantial improvement of the paper. We also thank Nanny Wermuth for stimulating discussions and Kenneth A. Bollen for kindly providing us with the data-set.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giudici, P., Stanghellini, E. Bayesian inference for graphical factor analysis models. Psychometrika 66, 577–591 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296197

Key words

Navigation