Skip to main content
Log in

The asymptotic bias of minimum trace factor analysis, with applications to the greatest lower bound to reliability

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In theory, the greatest lower bound (g.l.b.) to reliability is the best possible lower bound to the reliability based on single test administration. Yet the practical use of the g.l.b. has been severely hindered by sampling bias problems. It is well known that the g.l.b. based on small samples (even a sample of one thousand subjects is not generally enough) may severely overestimate the population value, and statistical treatment of the bias has been badly missing. The only results obtained so far are concerned with the asymptotic variance of the g.l.b. and of its numerator (the maximum possible error variance of a test), based on first order derivatives and the asumption of multivariate normality. The present paper extends these results by offering explicit expressions for the second order derivatives. This yields a closed form expression for the asymptotic bias of both the g.l.b. and its numerator, under the assumptions that the rank of the reduced covariance matrix is at or above the Ledermann bound, and that the nonnegativity constraints on the diagonal elements of the matrix of unique variances are inactive. It is also shown that, when the reduced rank is at its highest possible value (i.e., the number of variables minus one), the numerator of the g.l.b. is asymptotically unbiased, and the asymptotic bias of the g.l.b. is negative. The latter results are contrary to common belief, but apply only to cases where the number of variables is small. The asymptotic results are illustrated by numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh, F., Haeberly, J.-P., Nayakkankuppam, M.V., Overton, M.L., & Schmieta, S. (1997). SDPPACK (Version 0.9 BETA) [Computer software]. New York: Authors. (http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/overton/sdppack/sdppack.html)

  • Bentler, P.M. (1972). A lower-bound method for the dimension-free measurement of internal consistency.Social Science Research, 1, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M., & Woodward, J.A. (1980). Inequalities among lower bounds to reliability: with applications to test construction and factor analysis.Psychometrika, 45, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnans, J.F., & Shapiro, A. (2000).Peturbation analysis of optimization problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures.South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1988). Internal consistency of tests: Analyses old and new.Psychometrika, 53, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Riccia, G., & Shapiro, A. (1982). Minimum rank and minimum trace of covariance matrices.Psychometrika, 47, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 10, 225–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.H., & Agunwamba, C.C. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of total scores on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds.Psychometrika, 42, 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1973).Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T. (1970).Convex analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (1982). Rank-reducibility of a symmetric matrix and sampling theory of minimum trace factor analysis,Psychometrika, 47, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (1997). First and second order analysis of nonlinear semidefinite programs,Mathematical Programming, Series B, 77, 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socan, G. (1999, July).Bias in some lower bounds to reliability in medium-sized samples (poster presentation). 11th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Lüneburg, Germany.

  • ten Berge, J.M.F., & Zegers, F.E. (1978). A series of lower bounds to the reliability of a test.Psychometrika, 43, 575–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J.M.F., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zegers, F.E. (1981). Computational aspects of the greatest lower bound to reliability and constrained minimum trace factor analysis.Psychometrika, 46, 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, L., & Boyd, S. (1996). Semidefinite programming,SIAM Review, 38, 49–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N.D. (1998).Estimating the reliability of a test from a single test administration (Measurement and Research Department Report 98-2). Arnhem: CITO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, B., & Jackson, P.M. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II: A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound.Psychometrika, 42, 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Shapiro.

Additional information

This research was supported by grant DMI-9713878 from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, A., ten Berge, J.M.F. The asymptotic bias of minimum trace factor analysis, with applications to the greatest lower bound to reliability. Psychometrika 65, 413–425 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296154

Key words

Navigation