Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized latent trait models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a general model framework within which manifest variables with different distributions in the exponential family can be analyzed with a latent trait model. A unified maximum likelihood method for estimating the parameters of the generalized latent trait model will be presented. We discuss in addition the scoring of individuals on the latent dimensions. The general framework presented allows, not only the analysis of manifest variables all of one type but also the simultaneous analysis of a collection of variables with different distributions. The approach used analyzes the data as they are by making assumptions about the distribution of the manifest variables directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC.Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminger, G. & Küsters, U. (1988). Latent trait models with indicators of mixed measurement level. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.),Latent trait and latent class models (pp. 51–73). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1981). Posterior analysis of the factor model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1984). Scaling binary data using a factor model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 46, 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J., & Knott, M. (1999).Latent variable models and factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Arnold. (Kendall's Library of Statistics 7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J., & Tzamourani, P. (1999). The goodness-of-fit of latent trait models in attitude measurement.Sociological Methods and Research, 27, 525–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Test scores, sufficient statistics, and the information structures of tests. In F. M. Lord & Novick, M. R. (Eds.),Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 425–435). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.Psychometrika, 37, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of EM algorithm.Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1990).Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (1996). Generalized factor analysis.Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling. Orvieto, Italy.

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares.Quality and Quantity, 24, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix.Psychometrika, 59, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, M., & Albanese, M. T. (1993). Conditional distributions of a latent variable and scoring for binary data.Revista Brasileira de Probabilidade e Estatística, 6, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., & Bentler, P. (1992). Structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.Psychometrika, 57, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the em algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 44, 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch models for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. (1989).Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. (1992). Generalized linear item response theory.Psychological Bulletin, 115, 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustaki, I. (1996). A latent trait and a latent class model for mixed observed variables.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustaki, I. (1999). LATENT: A computer program for fitting a one- or two-factor latent variable model to categorical, metric and mixed observed items with missing values (Technical report). London School of Economics and Political Science, Statistics Department.

  • Moustaki, I. (in press). A latent variable model for ordinal variables.Applied Psychological Measurement.

  • Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1991).PARSCALE: Parameter scaling of rating data. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variables indicators.Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J., & Wedderburn, R. (1972). Generalized linear models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 135, 370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coeficient.Psychometrika, 44, 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., & Dorans, N. (1982). The polyserial correlation coeficient.Psychometrika, 47, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Muircheartaigh, C., & Moustaki, I. (1999). Symmetric pattern models: a latent variable approach to item non-response in attitude scales.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 162, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, M., & VandenBerg, M. (1994). Validity of the chi-square test in dichotomous variable factor analysis when expected frequencies are small.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores.Psychometrika Monograph Supplement No. 17.

  • Sammel, M., Ryan, L., & Legler, J. (1997). Latent variable models for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 59, 667–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis.Psychometrika 52, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & De Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables.Psychometrika, 52, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D. (1991).MULTILOG: Multiple, categorical items analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A model for multiple choice items.Psychometrika, 49, 501–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N. D., & Glas, C. A. W. (1993). A dynamic generalization of the rasch model.Psychometrika, 58, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moustaki, I., Knott, M. Generalized latent trait models. Psychometrika 65, 391–411 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296153

Key words

Navigation