Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on “equivalent linear logistic test models” by Bechger, Verstralen, and Verhelst (2002)

  • Notes And Comments
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses a new form of specifying and normalizing a Linear Logistic Test Model (LLTM) as suggested by Bechger, Verstralen, and Verhelst (Psychometrika, 2002). It is shown that there are infinitely many ways to specify the same normalization. Moreover, the relationship between some of their results and equivalent previous results in the literature is clarified, and it is shown that the goals of estimating and testing a single element of the weight matrix, for which they propose new methods, can be reached by means of simple, well-known tools already implemented in published LLTM software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bechger, T.M., Verstralen, H.H.F.M., & Verhelst, N.D. (2002). Equivalent linear logistic test models.Psychometrika, 67, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechger, T.M., Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (2001). Identifiability of nonlinear logistic test models.Psychometrika, 66, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butter, R.P., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N.D. (1998). An item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty.Psychometrika, 63, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints.Psychometrika, 48, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1995). The linear logistic test model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.),Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H., & Ponocny-Seliger, E. (1998).Structural Rasch Modeling. Handbook of the Usage of LPCM-WIN 1.0. Groningen, NL: ProGAMMA [see http://www.scienceplus.nl].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001).The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nährer, W. (1979). Zur Analyse von Matrizenaufgaben mit dem linearen logistischen Testmodell. [On the analysis of matrices items by means of the linear logistic test model.]Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 27, 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Pædagogiske Institut. (Expanded edition 1980. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1966).Lehrbuch Testtheorie Testkonstruktion. [Textbook of test theory and test construction.] Bern: Verag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, G.H. Remarks on “equivalent linear logistic test models” by Bechger, Verstralen, and Verhelst (2002). Psychometrika 69, 305–315 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295946

Key words

Navigation