Abstract
A multivariate reduced-rank growth curve model is proposed that extends the univariate reducedrank growth curve model to the multivariate case, in which several response variables are measured over multiple time points. The proposed model allows us to investigate the relationships among a number of response variables in a more parsimonious way than the traditional growth curve model. In addition, the method is more flexible than the traditional growth curve model. For example, response variables do not have to be measured at the same time points, nor the same number of time points. It is also possible to apply various kinds of basis function matrices with different ranks across response variables. It is not necessary to specify an entire set of basis functions in advance. Examples are given for illustration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, J. M., & Kshirsagar, A. M. (1993). The reduced-rank growth curve model for discriminant analysis of longitudinal data.Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 345–357.
Anderson, T. W. (1951). Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distributions.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 327–351.
Anderson, T. W. (1984).An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Bijleveld, C. C. J. H., & de Leeuw, J. (1991). Fitting longitudinal reduced-rank regression models by alternating least squares.Psychometrika, 56, 433–447.
Böckenholt, U., & Takane, Y. (1994). Linear constraints in correspondence analysis. In M. J. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.),Correspondence Analysis in Social Sciences (pp. 112–127). London: Academic Press.
Carter, E. M., & Hubert, J. J. (1984). A growth-curve model approach to multivariate quantal bioassay.Biometrics, 40, 699–706.
Chinchilli, V. M., & Elswick, R. K. (1985). A mixture of the MANOVA and GMANOVA models.Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 14, 3075–3089.
Curran, P. J. (1998). Introduction to hierarchical linear models of individual growth: An applied example using the SAS data system. Paper presented at the First International Institute on Developmental Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Curran, P. J., & Bollen, K. A. (1999). A hybrid latent trajectory model of stability and change: Applications in developmental psychology. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Davies, P. T., & Tso, M. K.-S. (1982). Procedures for reduced-rank regression.Applied Statistics, 31, 244–255.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Alpert, A., Hops, H., Stoolmiller, M., & Muthén, B. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel substance use data.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 275–318.
de Leeuw, J. (1989). Fitting reduced rank regression models by alternating maximum likelihood. UCLA Statistics Series 35. Department of Statistics, University of California at Los Angeles.
Gabriel, K. R., & Zamir, S. (1979). Low rank approximation of matrices by least squares with any choice of weights.Technometrics, 21, 489–498.
Gifi, A. (1990).Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Grizzle, J. E., & Allen, D. M. (1969). Analysis of growth and dose response curves.Biometrics, 25, 357–381.
Izenman, A. J. (1975). Reduced-rank regression for the multivariate linear model.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 5, 248–264.
Khatri, C. G. (1966). A note on a MANOVA model applied to problems in growth curves.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 18, 75–86.
Kiers, H. A. L., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1989). Alternating least squares algorithms for simultaneous components analysis with equal component weight matrices in two or more populations.Psychometrika, 54, 467–473.
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data.Biometrics, 38, 963–974.
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.Biometrika, 73, 13–22.
Lundbye-Christensen, S. (1991). A multivariate growth curve model for pregnancy.Biometrics, 47, 637–657.
Nummi, T. (1997). Estimation in a random effects growth curve model.Journal of Applied Statistics, 24, 157–168.
Nummi, T., & Möttönen, J. (2000). On the analysis of multivariate growth curves.Metrika, 52, 77–89.
Potthoff, R. F., & Roy, S. N. (1964). A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems.Biometrika, 51, 313–326.
Ramsay, J. O. (in press). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal and functional data. To appear in D. Moskowitz & S. Hershberger (Eds.),Modeling Intraindividual Variability with Repeated Measures Data: Methods and Applications. New York: Erlbaum Associates.
Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (1997).Functional Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rao, C. R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research.Sankhyã A,26, 329–358.
Rao, C. R. (1965). The theory of least squares when the parameters are stochastic and its application to the analysis of growth curves.Biometrika, 52, 447–458.
Rao, C. R. (1980). Matrix approximations and reduction of dimensionality in multivariate statistical analysis. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate Analysis (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Reinsel, G. C. (1982). Multivariate repeated-measurement or growth curve models with multivariate random-effects covariance structure.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 190–195.
Reinsel, G. C., & Velu, R. P. (1998).Multivariate Reduced-Rank Regression: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986).Akaike Information Criterion Statistics. Boston: D. Reidel.
Seber, G. A. F. (1984).Multivariate Observations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Takane, Y., & Shibayama, T. (1991). Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables.Psychometrika, 56, 97–120.
Takane, Y., Yanai, H., & Mayekawa, S. (1991). Relationships among several methods of linearly constrained correspondence analysis.Psychometrika, 56, 667–684.
van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1977). Redundancy analysis: An alternative for canonical analysis.Psychometrika, 42, 207–219.
van der Leeden, R. (1990).Reduced Rank Regression with Structured Residuals. Leiden: DSWO Press.
von Rosen, D. (1991). The growth curve model: A review.Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 9, 2791–2822.
Young, F. W. (1981). Quantitative analysis of qualitative data.Psychometrika, 46, 357–388.
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. Y. (1986). The analysis of discrete and continuous longitudinal data.Biometrics, 42, 121–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported in this paper was supported by Grant A6394 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the second author. We thank Jennifer Stephan for her helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We also thank Patrick Curran and Terry Duncan for kindly letting us use the NLSY and substance use data, respectively. The substance use data were provided by Grant DA09548 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, H., Takane, Y. A multivariate reduced-rank growth curve model with unbalanced data. Psychometrika 69, 65–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295840
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295840