Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of EU wine trade: A gravity model approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research study, a gravity model approach was used in order to analyze the main factors affecting the trade flows of wine in the EU. The empirical model was applied using data for the first twelve EU countries for the period 1989–97. It has been clearly shown in the empirical literature that gravity models can be successfully applied to a single commodity market. The present study utilized pooled cross-sectional and time series data in a one-way fixed effects model that accounted for country-pair heterogeneity. The results revealed that wine trade was positively influenced by an increase in GDP per capita, since greater income promotes trade. The remoteness of one country from another influenced exports positively and imports negatively, and the quantities traded did not prove to be very sensitive to wine prices. The depreciation of EU currencies and the high production of wine in the EU increased exports and reduced imports, while EU integration enhanced trade among members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, R. K. “International Trade Flows under Flexible Exchange Rates.”Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, March, 1980, pp. 3–10.

  • Aitken, N. D. “The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis,”American Economic Review, 63, 1973, pp. 881–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation,”American Economic Review, 69, 1979, pp. 106–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence,”Review of Economic and Statistics, 67, 1985, pp. 474–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • __ “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade,”Review of Economic and Statistics, 71, 1989, pp. 143–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougheas, S.; Demetriades, P. O.; Morgenroth, E. L. W. “Infrastructure, Transport Costs and Trade,”Journal of International Economics, 47, 1999, pp. 169–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brada, J. C.; Mendez, J. A. “Economic Integration among Developed, Developing and Centrally Planned Economies: A Comparative Analysis,”Review of Economic and Statistics, 67, 1985, pp. 549–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S.; Pagan, A. R. “The LaGrange Multiplier Test and its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics,”Review of Economic Studies, 47, 1980, pp. 239–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, I-Hui; Wall, Howard J. “Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade,” working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, February, 1999.

  • Daly, Kevin. “Does Exchange Rate Volatility Impede the Volume of Japan's Bilateral Trade?,”Japan and the World Economy, 10, 1998, pp. 333–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Distances Between the Two Cities,” 〈http://lazarus.elte.hu/∼guszlev/prg/capi9.htm〉.

  • European Commission. CD Eurostat Data, 1998.

  • __. “Agenda 2000: Common Organisation of the Market in Wine; CAP Reform: A Policy for the Future; CAP Reform: The Wine Sector; EU World Trade & WTO; The CAP — 1999 Review; Situation and Outlook: Wine Sector,” 〈http://europa.eu/int/comm/dg06〉, 2000.

  • FAO Statistical Database. “Populations; Productions of Wine,” 〈http://apps.fao.org/cgi-bin/nphdb.pl?subset=agriculture〉.

  • Geraci, V. J.; Prewo, W. “Bilateral Trade Flows and Transport Costs,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, 1977, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment,”Econometrica, 49, 1981, pp. 795–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • __Econometric Analysis, New York: Prentice Ltd., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, Daniel; Gonciarz, Andrzej. “A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe,”Journal of Political Economy, 12, 1996, pp. 709–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A. “Specification Tests in Econometrics,”Econometrica, 46, 6, 1978, pp. 1252–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A.; Taylor, William E. “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects,”Econometrica, 49, 6, 1981, pp. 1377–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,”Econometrica, 46, 1979, pp. 153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Cheng.Analysis of Panel Data, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

  • International Monetary Fund. IFS CD-ROM, version 1.1.53, 1998.

  • Judge, George G.; Hill, R. Carter; Griffiths, William E.; Lütkepohl, Helmut; Tsoung-Chao, Lee.The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second Edition, New York: Willey, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • __.Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second edition, John Wiley and Sons, 1985.

  • Koester, Ulrich. “International Trade and Agricultural Development in Developing Countries: Significance of the Uruguay Round of GATT Negotiations,”Agricultural Economics, 8, 1993, pp. 275–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Won W.; Karemera, David; Taylor, Richard. “A Gravity Model Analysis of Meat Trade Policies,”Agricultural Economics, 10, 1994, pp. 81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyannis, A.Theory of Econometrics. An Introductory Exposition of Econometric Methods, Second edition, Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Staffan Burenstam.An Essay on Trade and Transformation, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, H.An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren, D. “Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis and International Trade Theory: A Review of Recent Developments,”Journal of Agricultural Economics, 42, 3, 1991, pp. 250–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madalla, G. S. “The Use of the Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross-Section and Time-Series Data,”Econometrica, 39, 2, 1971, pp. 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, John. “National Border Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns,”The American Economic Review, 85, 3, 1995, pp. 615–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Yair. “On the Pooling of the Time Series and Cross Section Data,”Econometrica, 46, 1, 1978, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. “Annual OECD National Accounts Publication,” 〈http://www.oecd.org//stg/gdp.htm〉.

  • Ortalo-Magné, François. “An Econometric Analysis of U.S. Vital Wheat Gluten Imports,”Agricultural Economics, 7:, 1992, pp. 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polak, J. J. “Is APEC a Natural Regional Trading Bloc?,”The World Economy, September 1996, pp. 533–43.

  • Pöyhönen, P. “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries,”Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 90, 1963, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewo, W. “Determinants of the Trade Pattern among OECD Countries from 1958 to 1974,”Jahrbucher fur Nationalekonomieund Statistik, 193, 1978, pp. 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanso, Marcos; Rogelio, Cuairan; Sanz, Fernando. “Bilateral Trade Flows, the Gravity Equation, and Functional Form,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 1993, pp. 266–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. 1981. “Bilateral Benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences,”European Economic Review, 15, 1981, pp. 339–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloaga, Isidro; Winters, L. Alan. “Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?,”The World Bank Working Papers Series, August 1999.

  • Summary, Rebecca M. “A Political-Economic Model of U.S. Bilateral Trade,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 1, 1989, pp. 179–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamirisa, Natalia. “Exchange and Capital Controls as Barriers to Trade,”IMF Staff Papers, 46, 1, 1999, pp. 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, A. “Prediction in the Context of the Variance Component Model,”Journal of Econometrics, 10, 1979, pp. 103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbergen, J.Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census. “How Far Is It? The Latitude and the Longitude of Places,” 〈http://www.indo.com/cgi-bin/dist〉.

  • Wall, Horward J. “Using the Gravity Model to Estimate the Costs of Protection,”Review, Federal Reserve of St. Louis, January/February 1999, pp. 33–40.

  • White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,”Econometrica, 48, 1980, pp. 817–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. World Development Indicators, CD-ROM, version 4.0, 1997.

  • __. “Development Data: At- a — Glance Tables,” 〈http://www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/countrydata.html〉.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dascal, D., Mattas, K. & Tzouvelekas, V. An analysis of EU wine trade: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research 8, 135–147 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295344

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295344

Keywords

Navigation