Skip to main content
Log in

An ordinal coefficient of relational agreement for multiple judges

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article, Fagot proposed a generalized family of coefficients of relational agreement for multiple judges, focusing on the concept of empirically meaningful relationships. In this paper an ordinal coefficient of relational agreement, based on ranking data, is presented as a special case of the generalized family. It is shown that the proposed ordinal coefficient encompasses other ordinal coefficients, such as the Kendall coefficient of concordance, the average Spearman rank-order coefficient, and intraclass correlation based on ranks. It is also shown that the Kendall coefficient of concordance, corrected for chance agreement, is equivalent to the ordinal coefficient proposed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1952). On sampling from a population of rankers.Biometrika, 39, 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, R. F. (1993). A generalized family of coefficients of relational agreement for numerical scales.Psychometrika, 58, 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1924). The influence of rainfall on the yield of wheat at Rothamsted.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 213, 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. F. (1956). A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics.Psychometrika, 21, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, E. A. (1958).Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M., & Gibbons, J. D. (1990).Rank correlation methods. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. E. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N., Jr. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, W. W. (1989). Interobserver relational agreement.Psychological Bulletin, 106, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. A., & Young, M. A. (1985). Modeling ordinal scale disagreement.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegers, F. E. (1986). A family of chance-corrected association coefficients for metric scales.Psychometrika, 51, 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegers, F. E., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1985). A family of association coefficients for metric scales.Psychometrika, 50, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagot, R.F. An ordinal coefficient of relational agreement for multiple judges. Psychometrika 59, 241–251 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295186

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295186

Key words

Navigation