Skip to main content
Log in

On robusiness of the normal-theory based asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefficient estimates

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefficient estimates: Sample coefficient alpha, the reliability estimate of a composite score following a factor analysis, and the estimate of the maximal reliability of a linear combination of item scores following a factor analysis. Results indicate that the asymptotic distribution for each of the coefficient estimates, obtained based on a normal sampling distribution, is still valid within a large class of nonnormal distributions. Therefore, a formula for calculating the standard error of the sample coefficient alpha, recently obtained by van Zyl, Neudecker and Nel, applies to other reliability coefficients and can still be used even with skewed and kurtotic data such as are typical in the social and behavioral sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M.J., & Yen, W.M. (1979).Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini, A., & Valle, A.D. (1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribution.Biometrika, 83, 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1968). Alpha-maximized factor analysis (Alphamax): Its relation to alpha and canonical factor analysis.Psychometrika, 33, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1972). A lower-bound method for the dimension-free measurement of internal consistency.Social Science Research, 1, 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M., & Woodward, J.A. (1983). The greatest lower bound to reliability. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.),Principals of modern psychological measurement: A Festschrift for Frederic M. Lord (pp. 237–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986).Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Hott, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewes, D.W. (2000). Beyond the Spearman-Brown: A structural approach to maximal reliability.Psychological Methods, 5, 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldt, L.S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty.Psychometrika, 30, 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. (1996).A course in large sample theory. London, England: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, A. (1978). A method for simulating non-normal distributions.Psychometrika, 43, 521–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G.R., & Mueller, R.O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.),Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headrick, T.C., & Sawilowsky, S.S. (1999). Simulating correlated multivariate nonnormal distributions: Extending the Fleishman power method.Psychometrika, 64, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. (1963). The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts.Psychometrika, 28, 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. (1997). A unifying expression for the maximal reliability of a linear composite.Psychometrika, 62, 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1996). Reliability of measurement in psychology: From Spearman-Brown to maximal reliability.Psychological Methods, 1, 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Wainer, H. (1997). Toward a coherent view of reliability in test theory.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J.R., & Neudecker, H. (1999).Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics (rev. ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.P. (1999).Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J.L., Stafford, K.L., & Stauffer, J.M. (2000). Large-sample confidence intervals for validity and reliability coefficients.Psychological Methods, 5, 356–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures.Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein (1994).Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, H.G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.Psychological Methods, 5, 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures.Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1986). Some robustness properties of goodness of fit statistics in covariance structure analysis.American Statistical Association 1986 Proceedings of Business and Economics Sections (pp. 549–554). Alexander, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A., & ten Berge, J.M.F. (2000). The asymptotic bias of minimum trace factor analysis with applications to the greatest lower bound to reliability.Psychometrika, 65, 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadikamalla, P.R. (1980). On simulating non-normal distributions.Psychometrika, 45, 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J.M.F. (2000). Linking reliability and factor analysis: Recent developments in some classical psychometric problems. In S.E. Hampson (Ed),Advances in personality psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 138–156). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J.M.F., & Hofstee, W.K.B. (1999). Coefficients alpha and reliabilities of unrotated and rotated components.Psychometrika, 64, 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge, J.M.F., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1991). A numerical approach to the exact and the approximate minimum rank of a covariance matrix.Psychometrika, 56, 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G.H. (1940). Weighting for battery reliability and prediction.British Journal of Psychology, 30, 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, D., & Maurelli, V.A. (1983). Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions.Psychometrika, 48, 465–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zyl, J.M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D.G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of Cronbach's alpha.Psychometrika, 65, 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, B., & Jackson, P.H. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of a total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II. A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound.Psychometrika, 42, 579–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (1997). Generating multivariate distributions with specified marginal skewness and kurtosis. In W. Bandilla & F. Faulbaum (Eds.),SoftStat'97—Advances in statistical software 6 (pp. 385–391). Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). On normal theory and associated test statistics in covariance structure analysis under two classes of nonnormal distributions.Statistica Sinica, 9, 831–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (2000). Inferences on correlation coefficients in some classes of nonnormal distributions.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 72, 230–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke-Hai Yuan.

Additional information

This research was supported by grants DA01070 and DA00017 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and a University of North Texas faculty research grant. We would like to thank the Associate Editor and two reviewers for suggestions that helped to improve the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuan, KH., Bentler, P.M. On robusiness of the normal-theory based asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefficient estimates. Psychometrika 67, 251–259 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294845

Key words

Navigation