Skip to main content
Log in

Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide variety of paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments may be viewed as generalized linear models. These include paired comparison models based on both the Bradley-Terry and Thurstone-Mosteller approaches, as well as extensions of these models that allow for ties, order of presentation effects, and the presence of covariates. Moreover, the triple comparison model of Pendergrass and Bradley, as well as models for complete rankings of more than three items, can also be represented as generalized linear models. All such models can be easily fit by maximum likelihood, using the widely available GLIM computer package. Additionally, GLIM enables the computation of likelihood ratio statistics for testing many hypotheses of interest. Examples are presented that cover a variety of cases, along with their implementation on GLIM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B., & Hinde, J. (1989).Statistical modelling in GLIM. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. J. (1985). GLIM 3.77 Reference guide. InGLIM 3.77 reference manual. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group, Royal Statistical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, R. J. (1977a). Weighted least-squares analysis of several univariate Bradley-Terry models.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 629–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, R. J. (1977b). Weighted least squares response surface fitting in factorial paired comparisons.Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, A6(13), 1275–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. (1976). Science, statistics and paired comparisons.Biometrics, 32, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A. (1984). Paired comparisons: some basic procedures and examples. In P. R. Krishnaiah & P. K. Sen (Eds.),Handbook of statistics, Volume 4, (pp. 299–326). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 39, 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, D. E. (1985).Metric methods for analyzing partially ranked data (Lecture Notes in Statistics, Volume 34). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. (1988),The method of paired comparisons (2nd ed.). London: Charles Griffin & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. R. (1970). On extending the Bradley-Terry model to incorporate within-pair order effects,Biometrics, 33, 693–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. (1988).Group representations in probability and statistics. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1970). An interative procedure for estimation in contingency tables.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 901–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1979). Log linear representation for paired comparison models with ties and within-pair order effects.Biometrics, 35, 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E., & Larntz, K. (1976). Log linear representation for paired and multiple comparison models.Biometrika, 63, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligner, M. A., & Verducci, J. S. (1986). Distance-based ranking models.Journal of the Royal Statitical Society, Series B, 83, 859–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1091–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F., & Koch, G. G. (1969). Analysis of categorical data by linear models.Biometrics, 25, 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W. P. (1957). A revised law of comparative judgment.Psychometrika, 22, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrey, P. B., Johnson, W. D., & Koch, G. G. (1976). Incomplete contingency table approach to paired-comparison experiments.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 614–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, J. K. (1989).The analysis of categorical data using GLIM (Lecture Notes in Statistics, Volume 56). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C. L. (1957). Non-null ranking models. I.Biometrika, 44, 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989).Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. (1951). Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations.Psychometrika, 16, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 135, 370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergrass, R. N., & Bradley, R. A. (1960). Ranking in triple comparisons. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.),Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, (pp. 331–351). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. V., & Kupper, L. L. (1967). Ties in paired-comparison experiments: A generalization of the Bradley-Terry model.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivan, G. (1983). Within-pair order effects in paired comparisons.Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica, 18, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, C. D. (1982). GLIM for preference. In R. Gilchrist (Ed.),GLIM 82: Proceedings of the international conference on generalised linear models (pp. 164–178, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Volume 14). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springall, A. (1973). Response surface fitting using a generalization of the Bradley-Terry paired comparison model.Applied Statistics, 22, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, M. D. (1989).Microbiological spoilage of a moderate acid food system using a dairy-based salad dressing model. Unpublished masters thesis, Ohio State University, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work of both authors was supported by the National Science Foundation. The first author was also supported by an Ohio State University Seed Grant. The authors thank Edward Richter and Maria Vargo Thomas for supplying the salad dressing data in Example 3, and the Associate Editor and referees for suggestions which led to a much improved version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Critchlow, D.E., Fligner, M.A. Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM. Psychometrika 56, 517–533 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294488

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294488

Key words

Navigation