Skip to main content
Log in

Some relationships between factors and components

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The asymptotic correlations between the estimates of factor and component loadings are obtained for the exploratory factor analysis model with the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution for manifest variables. The asymptotic correlations are derived for the cases of unstandardized and standardized manifest variables with orthogonal and oblique rotations. Based on the above results, the asymptotic standard errors for estimated correlations between factors and components are derived. Further, the asymptotic standard error of the mean squared canonical correlation for factors and components, which is an overall index for the closeness of factors and components, is derived. The results of a Monte Carlo simulation are presented to show the usefulness of the asymptotic results in the data with a finite sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, C. O., & Jennrich, R. I. (1973). Standard errors for rotated factor loadings.Psychometrika, 38, 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arminger, G., & Schoenberg, R. J. (1989). Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation and test for misspecification in mean and covariance structure models.Psychometrika, 53, 409–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Dudgeon, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: statistical practice, theory, and directions.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures.South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24. (Reprinted in D. J. Aigner & A. S. Goldberger (Eds.),Latent variables in socioeconomic models, 1977, pp. 205–226. Amsterdam: North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1980). Factor analysis of multiple batteries by maximum likelihood.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.),Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1961). Tests of separate families of hypotheses.Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1987).Measurement error models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: some well and little known facts.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I. (1973). Standard errors for obliquely rotated factor loadings.Psychometrika, 38, 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. (1970). A theorem on the trace of certain matrix products and some applications.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1988).Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, H. (1998a). Standard errors of several indices for unrotated and rotated factors.Economic Review (Otaru University of Commerce), 49 (1), 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, H. (1998b). Standard errors for rotation matrices with an application to the promax solution.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, H. (1999). Standard errors for matrix correlations.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M. (1992). A study of an identification problem and substitute use of principal component analysis in factor analysis.Hiroshima Mathematical Journal, 22, 479–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiss, H. (1997). Factors and principal components in the near spherical case.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiss, H., & Mathes, H. (1995). Factor analysis and principal components.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H. (1990). Facts, fictions, and common sense about factors and components.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey, S. D. (1975).Statistical inference. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure (with comments and reply).Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1937). Some matrix-inequalities and metrization of matric-space.Tomsk University Review, 1, 286–300. (Reprinted in A. H. Traub (Ed.),John von Neumann collected works, Vol. 4, 1962, pp. 205–219. New York: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. H. (1965).The algebraic eigenvalue problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai, H. (1974). Unification of various techniques of multivariate analysis by means of generalized coefficient of determination.Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics, 1 (1), 46–54. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruhiko Ogasawara.

Additional information

The author is indebted to anonymous referees for their comments, corrections and suggestions which have led to the improvement of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogasawara, H. Some relationships between factors and components. Psychometrika 65, 167–185 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294372

Key words

Navigation