Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beals, R., Krantz, D. H., & Tversky, A. (1968). Foundations of multidimensional scaling.Psychological Review, 75, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1978). Restricted multidimensional scaling methods.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxom, B. Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces. (1978).Psychometrika, 43, 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. C. (1980). A model and algorithm for multidimensional scaling with external constraints on the distances.Psychometrika, 45, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol I). (pp. 105–155). New York & London: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. (1980). Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance) data. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.),Similarity and choice (pp. 234–289). Bern: Hans Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1973). A method for fitting a class of hierarchical tree structure models to dissimilarities data and its application to some “body parts” data of Miller's.Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8, 1097–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1980). Discrete and hybrid scaling models. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.),Similarity and choice (pp. 108–139). Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S., & Kruskal, J. B. (1980). CANDELINC: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters.Psychometrika, 45, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Wish, M. (1974). Models and methods for three-way multidimensional scaling. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II) (pp. 57–105). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, A. (1982).The user's guide to multidimensional scaling. Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. P. (1978). Free trees and bidirectional trees as representations of psychological distance.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., & Coxon, A. (1982).Key texts on multidimensional scaling. Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J., & Heiser, W. (1980). Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis.Biometrika, 53, 325–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Carmone, F. J. (1970).Multidimensional scaling and related techniques in marketing analysis. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1972).Applied Multidimensional Scaling: A Comparison of Approaches and Algorithms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points.Psychometrika, 33, 465–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, W. J., & DeLeeuw, J. (1979). How to use SMACOF-III. Leiden: Dept. of Datatheory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, C. B. (1969). Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures.Psychometrika, 34, 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., & Tversky, A. (1975). Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 4–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 29, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 29, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978).Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B. (1977). How to use KYST 2-A: A very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Unpublished manuscript, Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ.

  • Lingoes, J. C. (1972). A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Application in the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1: Theory. New York: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 42, 241–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. (1980). Some small sample results for maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 45, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. W. (1938). Multidimensional psychophysics.Psychological Bulletin, 35, 659–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. K., Shepard, R. N., & Nerlove, S. B. (1972).Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 2: Applications. New York: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskam, E. E.A documentation of MINISSA (N) (Technical Report 25 MA 15) Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Catholic University, Dept. of Psychology.

  • Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees.Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981).Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1962a). Analysis of proximities Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function—I.Psychometrika, 27, 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1962b). Analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function—II.Psychometrika, 27, 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1974). Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects.Psychometrika, 39, 373–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.Science, 210, 390–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Arabie, P. (1979). Additive clustering. Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties.Psychological Review, 86, 87–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Nerlove, S. B. (1972).Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1: Theory. New York: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y. (1981). Multidimensional successive-categories scaling: A maximum likelihood method.Psychometrika, 46, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & DeLeeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features.Psychometrika, 42, 7–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958).Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1972). Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis.Psychometrika, 37, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., & Householder, A. S. (1938). Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances.Psychometrika, 3, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AT & T Bell Laboratories, USA

    J. Douglas Carroll

Authors
  1. J. Douglas Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, J.D. Review. Psychometrika 50, 133–140 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294154

Search

Navigation