Skip to main content
Log in

Principal components analysis of sampled functions

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a technique for principal components analysis of data consisting ofn functions each observed atp argument values. This problem arises particularly in the analysis of longitudinal data in which some behavior of a number of subjects is measured at a number of points in time. In such cases information about the behavior of one or more derivatives of the function being sampled can often be very useful, as for example in the analysis of growth or learning curves. It is shown that the use of derivative information is equivalent to a change of metric for the row space in classical principal components analysis. The reproducing kernel for the Hilbert space of functions plays a central role, and defines the best interpolating functions, which are generalized spline functions. An example is offered of how sensitivity to derivative information can reveal interesting aspects of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1971).The statistical analysis of time series. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronszajn, N., (1950). Theory of reproducing kernels.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68, 337–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J.-P. (1979).Applied functional analysis. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besse, P. (1979). Etude descriptive des processus: Approximation et interpolation [Descriptive study of processes: Approximation and Interpolation]. Thèse de 3 cycle, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauxois, J., & Pousse, A. (1976). Les analyses factorielles en calcul des probabilité et en statistique: Essai d'étude synthètique [Factor analysis in the calculus of probability and in statistics]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, l'Université Paul-Sabatier de Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauxois, J., Pousse, A., & Romain, Y. (1982). Asymptotic theory for the principal component analysis of a vector random function: Some applications to statistical inference.Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 12, 136–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duc-Jacquet, M. (1973). Approximation des fonctionelles lineaires sur des éspaces hilbertiens auto-reproduisants [Approximation of linear functionals on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Grenoble.

  • Hunter, I. W., & Kearney, R. E. (1982). Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: Variation with mean ankle torque.Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 747–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, A. F. (1980).Reflections on Muscle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E., & Ostry, D. J. (1983). Computerized measurement of tongue dorsum movements with pulsed-echo ultrasound.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1309–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimeldorf, G. S., & Wahba, G. (1970). A correspondence between Bayesian estimation on stochastic processes and smoothing by splines.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimeldorf, G. S., & Wahba, G. A. (1971). Some results on Tchebycheffian spline functions.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application, 33, 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munhall, K. G. (1974). Temporal adjustment in speech motor control: Evidence from laryngeal kinematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.

  • Parzen, E. (1961). An approach to time series analysis.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 951–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. (1982). When the data are functions.Psychometrika, 47, 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves.Biometrics, 14, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal components analysis in applied research.Sankhya, 26(A), 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1980). Matrix approximations and reduction of dimensionality in multivariate statistical analysis. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis V (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, G. F. (1982).Green's Functions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, L. (1981).Spline Functions: Basic Theory, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H. S. (1971).Topics in Approximation Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stakgold, I. (1979).Green's Functions and Boundary Value Problems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis.Psychometrika, 23, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegmen, E. J., & Wright, I. W. (1983). Splines in statistics.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant PA 0320 to the second author by the Natural Sciences and Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to the reviewers of an earlier version and to J. B. Kruskal and S. Winsberg for many helpful comments concerning exposition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Besse, P., Ramsay, J.O. Principal components analysis of sampled functions. Psychometrika 51, 285–311 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293986

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293986

Key words

Navigation