Skip to main content
Log in

Conformity of two sociometric relations

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of comparing two sociometric relations or measurements (A andB) recorded in distinct sociomatrices was originally discussed by Katz and Powell in the early 1950's and Hubert and Baker in the late 1970's. The problem is considered again using a probabilistic model designed specifically for discrete-valued network measurements. The model allows for the presence of various structural tendencies, such as reciprocity and differential popularity. A parameter that isolates the tendency for actors to choose other actors on both relations simultaneously is introduced, and estimated conditional on the presence of other parameters that reflect additional important network properties. The parameter is presented as a symmetric index but is also generalized to the predictive (A onB orB onA) situation. This approach to the problem is illustrated with the same data used by the earlier solutions, and the unique nature of the two relations in the data set (A = received choices,B = perceived choices), as it affects the modeling, is discussed. Significance tests for the parameter and related parameters are described, as well as an extension to more than two relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (1984).Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. J., & Nelder, J. A. (1978).The GLIM system: Release 3. Generalized linear interactive modeling. Oxford: The Numerical Algorithms Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1980).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieberg, S. E., & Wasserman, S. (1981). Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.),Sociological Methodology 1981 (pp. 156–192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E., Meyer, M. M., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Statistical analysis of multiple sociometric relations.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Interorganizational resource networks: Formal patterns of overlap.Social Science Research, 7, 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1981). Comment on “An exponential family of probability densities for directed graphs” by P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability densities for directed graphs.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L. J., & Baker, F. B. (1978). Evaluating the conformity of sociometric measurements.Psychometrika, 43, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Powell, J. H. (1953). A proposed index of the conformity of one sociometric measurement to another.Psychometrika, 18, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1981). Interpersonal perception: A multivariate round robin analysis. In M. Brewer & B. Collins (Ed.),Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences (pp. 288–309). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Volume XVIII, pp. 141–181). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1983).Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., & Graziano, W. G. (1982). The statistical analysis of dyadic social behavior: A multivariate approach.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 532–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. M. (1981).Applications and generalizations of the iterative proportional fitting procedure, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. M. (1982). Transforming contingency tables.Annals of Statistics, 10, 1172–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Iacobucci, D. (1986). Statistical analysis of discrete relational data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Weaver, S. O. (1985). Statistical analysis of binary relational data: Parameter estimation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 406–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. O., & Wasserman, S. (1986). RELTWO: Interactive log linear model fitting for pairs of sociometric relations.Connections: Bulletin of the International Network for Social Network Analysis, 9, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research support provided by National Science Grant #SES84-08626 to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I am grateful to Dawn Iacobucci and Sheila Weaver for assistance with the research reported here, and to Carolyn Anderson, James Green, David Holtgrave, and four anonymous referees for comments on the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wasserman, S. Conformity of two sociometric relations. Psychometrika 52, 3–18 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293953

Key words

Navigation