Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of pairwise preference data using integrated B-splines

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pairwise preference data are represented as a monotone integral transformation of difference on the underlying stimulus-object or utility scale. The class of monotone transformations considered is that in which the kernel of the integral is a linear combination of B-splines. Two types of data are analyzed: binary and continuous. The parameters of the transformation and the underlying scale values or utilities are estimated by maximum likelihood with inequality constraints on the transformation parameters. Various hypothesis tests and interval estimates are developed. Examples of artificial and real data are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Notes

  • de Boor, C. & Rice, J. R.Least squares cubic spline approximation. I-Fixed knots; II-Variable knots (CSD TR 20 and 21). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.Estimating item characteristic curves without knowledge of their mathematical form (RB-68-8). Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. & Lind, J. M.Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, 1980.

References

  • Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974,19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, G.Multidimensional preference scaling. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. 1. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952,39, 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, H. On the distribution of the likelihood ratio.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954,25, 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. G. The numerical evaluation of B-splines.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 1972,10, 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H. B. & Schoenberg, I. J. On spline distributions and their limits: The Polya distribution functions, Abstract 380t.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1947,53, 1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H. B. & Schoenberg, I. J. On Polya frequency functions. IV: The fundamental spline functions and their limits.Journal d.Analyse Mathématique, 1966,17, 71–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boor, C. On calculating with B-splines.Journal of Approximating Theory, 1972,6, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boor, C.A practical guide to splines. New York: Springer Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, P. I. On the distribution of the log-likelihood ratio test statistic when the true parameter is “near” the boundaries of the hypothesis regions.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1968,39, 2044–2055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. R. Jr. Solution of a ranking problem from binary comparisons. Herbert Ellsworth Slaught Memorial Papers.American Mathematics Monthly, 1957,64, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. Some empirical tests of the method of paired comparisons.Journal of General Psychology, 1931,5, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods (2 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohle, R. H. An empirical evaluation and comparison of two models for discriminability scales.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformation of the data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1965,27, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J., Young, F. W., & Takane, Y. Additive structures in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features.Psychometrika, 1976,41, 471–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. The mystery of the missing corpus.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Monotonic weighted power transformations to additivity.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, J. O. Confidence regions for multidimensional scaling analysis.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model.The Annals of Statistics, 1978,6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., Young, F. W. & de Leeuw, J. An individual differences additive model: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features.Psychometrika, 1980,45, 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparitive judgment.Psychological Review, 1927,34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, S. & Ramsay, J. O. Monotonic Transformations to Additivity using splines.Biometrika, 1980,67, 669–674.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by a research grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winsberg, S., Ramsay, J.O. Analysis of pairwise preference data using integrated B-splines. Psychometrika 46, 171–186 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293898

Key words

Navigation