Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multicomponent latent trait models for ability tests

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major research direction for ability measurement has been to identify the information-processes that are involved in solving test items through mathematical modeling of item difficulty. However, this research has had limited impact on ability measurement, since person parameters are not included in the process models. The current paper presents some multicomponent latent trait models for reproducing test performance from both item and person parameters on processing components. Components are identified from item subtasks, in which performance is a logistic function (i.e., Rasch model) of person and item parameters, and then are combined according to a mathematical model of processing on the composite item.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  • Whitely, S. E. & Schneider, L.Process outcome models for verbal aptitude (Tech. Rep. No. NIE-80-1 for National Institute of Education grant NIE-6-7-0156). Lawrence, Kansas: Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, April, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R.A chronometric study of component skills in reading (NR 154–386 ONR Tech. Rep. 2). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Carroll, J. B. Psychometric tests as cognitive tasks: A new “structure of intellect”. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),The nature of intelligence. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D. E. Testing based on understanding: Implications from studies of spatial ability.Intelligence, 1979,3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. H. The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research.Acta Psychologica, 1973,37, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, W. F. Dynamic models for the measurement of “traits” in social behavior. In W. E. Kempf & B. Repp (Eds.),Mathematical models for social psychology. Bern: Hans Huber Publishers, and New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. Beyond structure: In search of functional models of psychological process.Psychometrika, 1972,37, 357–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R. G. The interpretation of reaction-time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human Information-Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. Cognitive correlates and components in the analysis of individual differences.Intelligence, 1979.

  • Samejima, F. Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multi-dimensional latent space.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiblechner, H. Das liernen und losen komplexer denkaufgaben.Z.f. exp.u. angew. Psychol., 1972,19, 476–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. Theory and research on aptitude processes.Intelligence, 1978,2, 225–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada, H. Logistic models of learning and thought. In H. Spada & W. F. Kempf (Eds.),Structural models of thinking and learning. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber Publishers, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review, 1977,34, No. 4, 356–378(a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. The nature of mental abilities.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 214–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S. E. Latent trait models in the study of intelligence.Intelligence, 1980,4, 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S. E. Modeling aptitude test validity from cognitive components.Journal of Educational Psychology, in press.

  • Whitely, S. E. Information-processing on intelligence test items. Some response components.Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978,1, 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, S. E., & Barnes, G. M. The implications of processing event sequences for theories of analogical reasoning.Memory & Cognition, 1979,1, 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Kansas, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas

    Susan E. Whitely

Authors
  1. Susan E. Whitely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to thank David Thissen for his invaluable insights concerning this model and an anonymous reviewer for his suggestion about the sample space for the model.

This research was partially supported by National Institute of Education grant number NIE-6-7-0156 to Susan E. Whitely, principal investigator. However the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the National Institute of Education, and no official endorsement by the National Institute of Education should be referred. Part of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of thePsychometric Society, Monterey, California: June, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitely, S.E. Multicomponent latent trait models for ability tests. Psychometrika 45, 479–494 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293610

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293610

Key words

Search

Navigation