Skip to main content
Log in

A nonmetric variety of linear factor analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The numbers in each column of ann ×m matrix of multivariate data are interpreted as giving the measured values of alln of the objects studied on one ofm different variables. Except for random error, the rank order of the numbers in such a column is assumed to be determined by a linear rule of combination of latent quantities characterizing each row object with respect to a small number of underlying factors. An approximation to the linear structure assumed to underlie the ordinal properties of the data is obtained by iterative adjustment to minimize an index of over-all departure from monotonicity. The method is “nonmetric” in that the obtained structure in invariant under monotone transformations of the data within each column. Except in certain degenerate cases, the structure is nevertheless determined essentially up to an affine transformation. Tests show (a) that, when the assumed monotone relationships are strictly linear, the recovered structure tends closely to approximate that obtained by standard (metric) factor analysis but (b) that, when these relationships are severely nonlinear, the nonmetric method avoids the inherent tendency of the metric method to yield additional, spurious factors. From the practical standpoint, however, the usefulness of the nonmetric method is limited by its greater computational cost, vulnerability to degeneracy, and sensitivity to error variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., and Brunk, H. D.Statistical inference under order restrictions. New York: Wiley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. F. Determination of the number of independent parameters of a score matrix from the examination of rank orders.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., and MacLane, S.A survey of modern algebra. New York: Macmillan, 1953, (revised edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. Polynomial factor analysis.Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1969,4, 103–104. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. Non-parametric multidimensional analysis of paired-comparisons data.Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Psychometric and Psychonomic Societies, Niagara Falls, October 1964.

  • Coombs, C. H.A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H., and Kao, R. C. Nonmetric factor analysis.Engineering Research Bulletin No.38, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H., and Kao, R. C. On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart, C., and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, (revised edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. J. Method of gradients. In G. Leitman (Ed.),Optimization techniques. New York: Academic Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer, E. T., and Shrimpton, N. Preference scaling via a modification of Shepard's proximity analysis method.Human Factors, 1963,5, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27. (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 28–42. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1965,27, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Monotone regression: Continuity and differentiability properties.Psychometrika, 1971,36, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., and Carroll, J. D. Geometric models and badness-of-fit functions. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis II. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 639–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science, Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 476–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. V. Transformations that render curves parallel.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970,7, 410–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. V. Transforming curves into curves with the same shape.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1972,9, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, and S. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and application in the behavioral sciences (Volume I, Theory). New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C., and Guttman, L. Nonmetric factor analysis: A rank reducing alternative to linear factor analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1967,2, 485–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. A general approach to nonlinear factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. Nonlinear factor analysis.Psychometric Monograph No. 15, 1967.

  • Rosen, J. B. Gradient projection method for non-linear programing.Journal SIAM, 1960,8, 181–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function (I & II).Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–139, 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. Extracting latent structure from behavioral data. InProceedings of the 1964 symposium on digital computing. Bell Telephone Laboratories, May, 1964.

  • Shepard, R. N. Approximation to uniform gradients of generalization by monotone transformations of scale. In D. Mostofsky (Ed.),Stimulus generalization. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1965. Pp. 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. Metric structures in ordinal data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. A taxonomy of some principal types of data and of multidimensional methods for their analysis. In R. N. Shepard A. K. Romney, and S. Nerlove (Eds.),Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Volume I, Theory). New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., and Carroll, J. D. Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1966. PP. 561–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., and Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric methods for scaling and for factor analysis,American Psychologist, 1964,19, 557–558. (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L.Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Although the method described here existed as an operational computer program toward the end of 1962 and although the tests reported here were completed by 1966, this is the first full description of the method and report of the results of the test application. The preparation of this paper was in part supported by NSF grants GS-1302 and GS-2283 to the second author and was completed during the second author's tenure as a John Simon Guggenheim Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford. The authors are indebted to J. D. Carroll, Mrs. J.-J. Chang, Mrs, C. Brown, and the former Miss M. M. Sheenan, all of the Bell Telephone Laboratories, for their assistance in connection with the test application.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kruskal, J.B., Shepard, R.N. A nonmetric variety of linear factor analysis. Psychometrika 39, 123–157 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291465

Keywords

Navigation