Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical psychology—Art or science

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper questions the oft-repeated statement that clinical psychology is an art by examining the main functions of clinical psychologists, i.e., diagnosis and treatment. In examining the concept of diagnosis, evidence is presented which supports the notion that a diagnostic statement has meaning only when it has a referent in the future—when it provides a prediction. A prediction (probability-statement) is determined empirically and may be stated in terms of a regression equation or in terms of a crude generalization from clinical experience. Treatment likewise is determined by tacit or expressed predictions of behavior under alternative conditions. The various conceptions of art as applied to clinical psychology are examined and the conclusion is drawn that clinical psychology is a scientific as opposed to an artistic or intuitive enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allport, Gordon W. The psychologist's frame of reference.Psychol. Bull., 1940,37, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allport, F. H. Teleonomic description in the study of personality.Character and Personality, 1937,5, 202–214.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordin, Edward S. and Sarbin, Theodore R. Studies in interviewing. (in preparation).

  4. Brown, J. F. Psychology and the social order. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dub, L. A. and Lurie, L. S. Use of benzedrine in the depressed phase of the psychotic state.Ohio State Medical Journal, 1939,35, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, D. B. Scientific understanding in psychology.Psychol. Rev., 1932,32, 552–569.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Louttit, C. M. The nature of clinical psychology.Psychol. Bull. 1939,36, 361–389.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lundberg, George. Social research, New York: Longmans Green, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker, M. M. A method for evaluating the experimental use of drugs in psychopathology.J. abnor. soc. Psychol., 1939,34, 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Porter, T. H., Jr. The development and evaluation of a measure of counseling interview procedure.Psychol. Bull., 1941,38, 524–525.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reichenbach, H. Experience and Prediction. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. J.Management and the worker. Cambridge: Harv. Univ. Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers, Carl R. The clinical treatment of the problem child. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sarbin, Theodore R. The relative accuracy of clinical and statistical predictions of academic achievement. Paper read at the 1941 meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Athens, Ohio (soon to be published).

  15. Sarbin, Theodore R. The logic of prediction in psychology (adapted from Ph.D. thesis on file in the library of the Ohio State University) (soon to be published).

  16. Viteles, M. S. The clinical viewpoint in vocational psychology.J. appl. Psychol, 1925,9, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Westburgh, Edward M. Introduction to clinical psychology. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston's Sons, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson, E. G. How to counsel students. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Windelband, W. An introduction to philosophy. London: T: Fisher Unwin, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wittman, Mary Phyllis. A scale for measuring prognosis in schizophrenic patients.Elgin Papers, 1941,4, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wittman, Mary Phyllis. Evaluation of prognosis in the functional psychoses.Psychol. Bull, 1941,38, 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper read at the 49th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association at Evanston, Illinois, September 3–6, 1941.

This analysis may be applied with little modification to the fields of social work, psychiatry, vocational guidance, and related professions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarbin, T.R. Clinical psychology—Art or science. Psychometrika 6, 391–400 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288596

Keywords

Navigation