Skip to main content
Log in

Complex analyses of variance: General problems

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems in applying the analysis of variance are discussed. Emphasis is placed on using the technique to understand the data. The scale of the dependent variable is important for the analysis. Crossed and nested categories must be recognized. The error terms in the analysis depend on whether the classes of each independent variable are (1) all out of a few or (2) a few out of many. To simplify the analysis, mean squares should be aggregated with their error term when they are less than twice its size. An illustrative example is discussed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, R. C. and Bancroft, T. A.Statistical theory in research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bozivich, H., Bancroft, T. A., and Hartley, H. O. Power of analysis of variance test procedures for certain incompletely specified models, I.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 1017–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, C. A. and Franklin, N. L.Statistical analysis in chemistry and the chemical industry. New York: Wiley, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bross, I. Fiducial intervals for variance components.Biometrics, 1950,6, 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cochran, W. G. Testing a linear relation among variances.Biometrics, 1951,7, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornfield, J. and Tukey, J. W. Average values of mean squares in factorials.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 907–949.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crump, S. L. The present status of variance component analysis.Biometrics, 1951,7, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenhart, C. The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance.Biometrics, 1947,3, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grant, D. A. Analysis-of-variance tests in the analysis and comparison of curves.Psychol. Bull., 1956,53, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grindley, G. C. The variation of sensory thresholds with the rate of application of the stimulus. I. The differential threshold for pressure.Brit. J. Psychol., 1936–37,27, 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, P. O.Statistical methods in research. New York: Prentice Hall, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, P. O. and Tsao, F. Factorial design in the determination of differential limen values.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 107–144.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kempthorne, O.The design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kogan, L. S. Variance designs in psychological research.Psychol. Bull., 1953,50, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mood, A. M.Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pal, G. Limens for continuous change.Indian J. Psychol., 1944,19, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paull, A. E. On a preliminary test for pooling mean squares in the analysis of variance.Ann. math. Statist., 1950,21, 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Satterthwaite, F. E. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.Biometrics, 1946,2, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheffé, H. Alternative models for the analysis of variance.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, H. F. The problem of comparing the results of two experiments with unusual errors.Jour. G.S.I.R. (Australia), 1936,9, 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tukey, J. W. Components in regression.Biometrics, 1951,7, 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tukey, J. W. Interaction in a row-by-column design. Memo. Rep. No. 18, Statist. Res. Group, Princeton Univ., 1949.

  23. Tukey, J. W. Variances of variance components: I. Balanced designs.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 722–736.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Welch, B. L. The specification of rules for rejecting too variable a product, with particular reference to an electric lamp problem.J. roy. statist. Soc. Suppl., 1936,3, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilk, M. B. The logical derivation of linear models for experimental situations and their use in selecting the appropriate error term in the analysis of variance, I, AV-3 (1953); II, On the analysis of a general randomized block type design, AV-4 (1954); III, (with O. Kempthorne) The expectations of mean squares for a general three-way classification, AV-7 (1954); IV, (with O. Kempthorne) Fixed, mixed, and random models, AV-8 (1954); V, Expectations of mean squares for a general three-way classification (Part 2), AV-9 (1954); VI, Interactions with experimental units, AV-10 (1954). Analysis of variance project reports, Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State College.

  26. Wilk, M. B. and Kempthorne, O. Fixed, mixed, and random models.J. Amer. statist. Assoc., 1955,50, 1144–1167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Prepared in connection with research sponsored in part by the Office of Naval Research, in part by the Educational Testing Service, and in part by Lincoln Laboratory, a center for research operated by Massachusetts Institute of Technology with the joint support of the U. S. Army, Navy, and Air Force.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, B.F., Tukey, J.W. Complex analyses of variance: General problems. Psychometrika 25, 127–152 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288577

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288577

Keywords

Navigation