Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Publication productivity and professional position: Cross-national evidence on the role of organizations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of strafication in science have increasingly accepted the idea that science is a highly stratified and elitist system with skewed distributions of productivity and rewards. Attempts to explain the higher productivity of higher status scientists by pointing to their greater ease of publication as far as acceptance of their work by journals and publishers is concerned were not supported by the data in some recent studies. If status in general does not confer greater ease of publication the present paper argues that position within a research organization does confer greater ease of author — or co-authorship — and this is the major explanatory variable accounting for productivity differences within research laboratories as far as quantity of articles (and books) is concerned. upward moves in a laboratory's formal or informal position hierarchy are associated with a change of a scientist's research involvement from goal executing to goal setting functions as well as with an increasing access to scientific manpower and project money. Goal setting tasks provide for a significant reduction of time-expenditures in research necessary to assure that the scientist is identified with the research results; consequently, they allow for an involvement in more research tasks than originally. Equivalently, resources in scientific manpower and project money act as a multiplying element as far as quantity of output is concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Y. LOTKA, The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity,Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16 (1926) 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. de SOLLA PRICE,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. K. MERTON, The Matthew Effect in Science,Science, 59 (1968) 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. MELTZER, Scientific Productivity in Organizational Settings,Journal of Social Issues, 12 (1956) 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. MELTZER, J. SALTER, Organizational Structure and the Performance and Job Satisfaction of Physiologists,American Sociological Review, 27 No. 3 (1962) 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. CLARK, America's Psychologists, American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. M. MELTZER, The Productivity of Social Scientists,American Journal of Sociology, 55 (1949) 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. J. AXELSON, Differences in Productivity of Doctorates in Sociology,Journal of Educational Sociology, 33 (1959) 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. BABCHUK, A. BATES, Professor or Produce: The Two Faces of Academic Man,Social Forces, 40 (1962) 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. CLEMENTE, Early Career Determinants of Research Productivity,American Journal of Sociology, 79 No. 2. (1974) 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. D. KNORR, M. HALLER, W. ZEHETNER, G. ZILIAN, Erkenntnis- und Verwertungsbedingungen sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung, Jugend und Volk Verlag, Vienna, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. BEN-DAVID, Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth Century Medicine,American Sociological Review, 25 (1960) 828–843.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. CRANE, Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition,American Sociological Review, 30 (1965) 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. THOMASSON, J. STANLEY, Exploratory Study of Productivity and ‘Creativity’ of Prominent Psychometricians. Unpubl. manuscript, Univ. of Wisconsin, 1966.

  15. S. COLE, J. R. COLE, Scientific Output and Recognition. A Study in the Reward System in Science,American Sociological Review, 32 (1967) 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. C. GASTON, Big Science in Britain: A Sociological Study of the High Energy Physics Community. Ph. D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. COLE, Patterns of Intellectual Influence in Scientific Research,Sociology of Education, 43 (1970) 377–403.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. A. ZUCKERMAN, R. K. MERTON, Patterns of Evaluation in Science, Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System,Minerva, 9 (1971) 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. O. HAGSTROM, Inputs, Outputs and the Prestige of University Science Departments,Sociology of Education, 44 (1971) 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. S. BLUME, R. SINCLAIR, Chemists in British Universities: A study of the Reward System in Science,American Sociological Review, 38 (1973) 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. S. BLUME, R. SINCLAIR, Research Environment and Performance in British University Chemistry, Science Policy Studies, No. 6, HMSO, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. C. PELZ, F. M. ANDREWS,Scientists in Organizations, Productive Climates for Research and Development, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966; Second, enlarged and revised edition, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. L. HARGENS, W. O. HAGSTROM, Sponsored and Contest Mobility of American Academic Scientists,Sociology of Education, 40 (1967) 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. L. HARGENS, Patterns of Mobility of New Ph. D.'s among American Academic Institutions,Sociology of Education, 42 (1969) 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. L. HARGENS, Patterns of Scientific Research: A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields, American Sociological Association, Washington, D. C. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. D. ALLISON, J. A. STEWART, Productivity Differences among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage,American Sociological Review, 39 (1974) 596–606.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. MITTERMEIR, K. D. KNORR, Scientific Productivity and Accumulative Advantage: A Thesis Reassessed,R&D Management, (1979), in print.

  28. F. ANDREWS (Ed.),Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge Univ. Press, Unesco, London, Paris, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. COLE, L. RUBIN, J. R. COLE, Peer Review and the Support of Science,Scientific American, 237 (1977) 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. R. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. A. ZUCKERMAN,Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, The Free Press, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. WHITLEY, The Sociology of Scientific Work and the History of Scientific Developments, in:Perspectives in the Sociology of Science, S. BLUME (Ed.), Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. WHITLEY, Changes in the Social and Intellectual Organization of the Sciences, in:The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Sociology of the Sciences, Vol. 1, E. MENDELSOHN, P. WEINGART, R. WHITLEY (Eds), D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. WHITLEY, Types of Science, Organizational Strategies, and Patterns of Work in Research Laboratories in Different Scientific Fields,Social Science Information, 17 (1978) 427–47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. D. KNORR, Producing and Reproducing Knowledge: Descriptive or Constructive?Social Science Information, 16 (1977) 669–696.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. D. KNORR, Contextuality and Indexicality of Organizational Action: Toward a Transorganizational Theory of Organizations,Social Science Information, 18 (1979) 1085–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. WHITLEY, Black Boxism and the Sociology of Science: a Discussion of the Major Developments in the Field,Sociological Review, 18 (1972) 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. WHITLEY, Components of Scientific Activities, their Characteristics and Institutionalization in Specialties and Research Areas, in:Determinants and Controls of Scientific Development, K. D. KNORR, H. STRASSER, H. G. ZILIAN (Eds), D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. WEINGART,Wissensproduktion und soziale Struktur, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. O. HAGSTROM, Competition and Teamwork in Science. Dep. of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, mimeo, Madison/Wisconsin, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. E. CHUBIN, S. MOITRA, Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423–41.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. SULLIVAN, D. H. WHITE, E. J. BARBONI, Co-Citation Analysis of Science: an Evaluation,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 223–40.

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. E. CHUBIN, K. E. STUDER, Network Structures in a Cancer Problem Domain: a Reorientation for Micro Studies in the Sociology of Sciences. Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1977.

  44. G. COLE, Classifying Research Units by Patterns of Performance and Influence: A Typology of the Round 1 Data, in:Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, F. ANDREWS (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Unesco, London, Paris, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. C. LEHMANN,Age and Achievement, Princeton University, Press, Princeton, N. J. 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. C. LEHMANN, The Chemists' Most Creative Years,Science, 227 (1958) 1213–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. C. LEHMANN, The Age Decremant in Scientific Creativity,American Psychologist, 15 (1960) 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  48. K. D. KNORR, R. MITTERMEIR, G. AICHHOLZER, G. WALLER, Individual Publication Productivity as a Social Position Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Units. Research Memorandum 117, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  49. S. COTGROVE, S. BOX,Science, Industry and Society, Allen & Unwin, London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  50. T. S. KUHN, The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research, in:Scientific Creativity, its Recognition and Development, C. W. TAYLOR, F. BARRON (Eds), Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  51. G. GORDON, S. MARQUIS, Freedom, Visibility of Consequences, and Scientific Innovation,American Journal of Sociology, 72 (1966) 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. G. JÖRESKOG, M. van THILLO, Lisrel: A General Computer Program for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System Involving Multiple Indicators of Unmeasured Variables. Unpubl. research bulletin RB-R-26, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N. Y. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  53. K. G. JÖRESKOG, Analyzing Psychological Data by Structural Analysis of Covariance Matrices, in:Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II, D. H. KRANTZ, R. D. LUCE, R. C. ATKINSON, P. SUPPE (Eds), W. H. Freeman and Comp, San Francisco, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. WALLER, Individuelle Produktivität in akademischen Forschungsorganisationen: Eine Goodman Analyse. Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  55. L. A. GOODMAN, A Modified Multiple Regression Approach to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables,American Sociological Review, 37 (1972) 28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  56. L. A. GOODMAN, A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys,American Journal of Sociology, 77 (1972) 1035–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  57. L. A. GOODMAN, Causal Analysis of Data from Panel Studies and other Kinds of Surveys,American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973) 1135–91.

    Google Scholar 

  58. G. KÜPPERS, P. LUNDGREEN, P. WEINGART,Umweltforschung, die gesteuerte Wissenschaft? Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  59. F. NARIN, Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activities, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, N. J., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  60. S. COLE, J. R. COLE, Measuring the Qualitiy of Sociological Research: Problems in the Use of the Science Citation Index,American Sociologist, 6 (1971) 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  61. N. C. MULLINS, A Sociological Theory of Scientific Revolution, in: Determinants and Controls of Scientific Development, K. KNORR, H. STRASSER, H. G. ZILIAN (Eds), D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Dordrecht, Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  62. H. A. ZUCKERMAN, Stratification in American Science,Sociological Inquiry, 40 (1970) 235–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, (USA)

    K. D. Knorr

  2. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, (USA)

    R. Mittermeir

Authors
  1. K. D. Knorr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Mittermeir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knorr, K.D., Mittermeir, R. Publication productivity and professional position: Cross-national evidence on the role of organizations. Scientometrics 2, 95–120 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02279362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02279362

Keywords

Search

Navigation