Abstract
Several statistical methods which employ multiple marker data are currently available for the analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in experimental populations. Although comparable estimates of QTL location and effects have been obtained by these methods, using simulated and real data sets, their accuracy and reliability have not been extensively investigated. The present study specifically examines the merit of using F2 and doubled haploid populations for locating QTL and estimating their effects. Factors which may affect accuracy and reliability of QTL mapping, such as the number and position of the markers available, the accuracy of the marker locations and the size of the experimental population used, are considered. These aspects are evaluated for QTL of differing heritabilities and locations along the chromosome.
A population of 300 F2 individuals and 150 doubled haploid lines gave estimates of QTL position and effect which were comparable, albeit extremely unreliable. Even for a QTL of high heritability (10%), the confidence interval was 35 cM. There was little increase in reliability to be obtained from using 300, rather than 200, F2 individuals and 100 doubled haploid lines gave similar results to 150. QTL estimates were not significantly improved either by using the expected, rather than the observed, marker positions or by using a dense map of markers rather than a sparse map. A QTL which was asymmetrically located in the linkage group resulted in inaccurate estimates of QTL position which were seriously biassed at low heritability of the QTL. In a population of 300 F2 individuals the bias increased from 4 cM to 20 cM, for a QTL with 10% and 2% heritability respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckmann JS, Soller M: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs. Theor Appl Genet 67: 35–43 (1983).
Breese EL, Mather K: The organisation of polygenic activity within a chromosome inDrosophila. I. Hair characters. Heredity 11: 373–395 (1957).
Breese EL, Mather K: The organisation of polygenic activity within a chromosome in Drosophila: II Viability. Heredity 14: 375–400 (1960).
Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller JI, Soller M: Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics 134: 943–951 (1993).
Dudley JW: Molecular markers in plant improvement: manipulation of genes affecting quantitative traits. Crop Sci 33: 660–668 (1993).
Haldane JBS: The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors J Genet 8: 299–309 (1919).
Haley CS, Knott SA: A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315–324 (1992).
Hyne V, Kearsey MJ, Martinez O, Gang W, Snape JW: A partial genome assay for quantitative trait loci in wheat (Triticum aestivum) using different analytical techniques. Theor Appl Genet 89: 735–741 (1995).
Jensen J: Estimation of recombination parameters between a quantitative trait locus (QTL) and two marker gene loci. Theor Appl Genet 78: 613–618 (1989).
Kearsey MJ, Hyne V: QTL analysis: a simple ‘marker regression’ approach. Theor Appl Genet 89: 698–702 (1994).
Knapp SJ, Bridges WC, Birkes D: Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular marker linkage maps. Theor Appl Genet 79: 583–592 (1990).
Lander ES, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185–199 (1989).
Law CN: The location of genetic factors affecting a quantitative character in wheat. Genetics 53: 487–498 (1966).
Law CN: The location of genetic factors controlling a number of quantitative characters in wheat. Genetics 56: 445–461 (1967).
Martinez O, Curnow RNC: Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor Appl Genet 85: 480–488 (1993).
Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD: Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335: 721–726 (1988).
Paterson AH, De Verna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley SD: Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected over-lapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124: 735–742 (1990).
Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD: Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127: 181–197 (1991).
Sax K: The association of size differences with seed coat pattern and pigmentation inPhaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8: 552–560 (1923).
Snape JW, Law CN, Parker BB, Worland AJ: Genetical analysis of chromosome 5A of wheat and its influence on important agronomic characters. Theor Appl Genet 71: 518–522 (1985).
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman, New York (1981).
Today JM: Location of polygenes. Nature 191: 368–370 (1961).
van Ooijen JW: Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor Appl Genet 84: 803–811 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hyne, V., Kearsey, M.J., Pike, D.J. et al. QTL analysis: unreliability and bias in estimation procedures. Mol Breeding 1, 273–282 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277427
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277427