Skip to main content
Log in

Being skeptical about the medical humanities

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the author challenges the prevailing view that contemporary writing in the medical humanities is serving the needs of the various health care disciplines. The current medical humanities literature assumes that physicians are the appropriate target group. This is most notably the case within health care ethics literature. There appears to be an unexamined assumption that physician-centric approaches to clinical ethical decision-making are the standard by which appropriate ethical practice is judged. The author challenges this assumption and addresses the problems that this approach engenders. The medical humanities literature appears to reinforce hierarchical, patriarchal arrangements which are themselves not morally neutral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1990).Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, J. Being skeptical about the medical humanities. J Med Hum 16, 265–277 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276583

Keywords

Navigation