Skip to main content
Log in

Polymer encapsulated staionary phases: Advantages, properties and selectivities

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

By copolymerization of vinyl modified silica with acrylic acid derivatives stationary phases with imporved stability and optimum performance for the separation of basic solutes, can be prepared in a reproducible way. With a film thickness of around 1 nm the surface silanols are completely shielded but column performance is not decreased by slow mass transfer in the polymeric film. The stability of these polymer encapsulated silica based stationary phases is superior to that of conventional silanized phases in respect of column lifetime and stability at high pH values. By modification of the acrylic acid derivative cation-and anion exchanger, polar phases and chiral stationary phases of high enantioselectivity have been prepared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Karch, I. Sebestian, I. Halász, J. Chromatogr.,122, 3 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Engelhardt G. Ahr, Chromatographia14, 227 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Engelhardt, B. Dreyer, H. Schmidt, Chromatographia16, 11 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. C. Sander, S. A. Wise, J. Chromatogr.316, 167 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Unger, “Porous Silica”, J. Chromatogr. Library, Vol. 16 Elsevier, Amsterdam (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. G. Woddell, D. F. Leyden, M. T. DeBello, J. Am. Chem. Soc.103, 5303 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Kirkland, J. L. Glajch, R. D. Farlee, Anal. Chem.61, 2 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Engelhardt, M. Czok, R. Schultz, E. Schweinheim, J. Chromatogr.458, 79 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Aschrif-Khorassani, L. T. Taylor, R. A. Henry, Anal. Chem.60, 1529 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Schomburg, A. Decke, J. Köhler, U. Bien-Vogelsang, J. Chromatogr.282, 27 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Schomburg, J. Köhler, H. Figge, A. Deege, Chromatographia18, 265 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. B. Wheals, J. Chromatogr.107, 402 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Sebestian, I. Halász, Adv. Chromatogr.14, 75 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Engelhardt, M. Jungheim, Lecture at 9th Symposium on Column Liquid Chromatography, San Francisco (1986).

  15. H. Löw, H. Engelhardt, Anal. Chem.330, 396 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Halász, K. Martin, Angew. Chem.90, 954 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Werner, I. Halász, J. Chromatogr. Sci.18, 277 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Daltrup, B. Kardel Chromatographia18, 81 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. T. Hearn, Advanc. Chromatogr.20, 1 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Engelhardt, H. Müller, Chromatographia19, 77 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Blaschke, J. Liq. Chromatogr.9, 341 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelhardt, H., Löw, H., Eberhardt, W. et al. Polymer encapsulated staionary phases: Advantages, properties and selectivities. Chromatographia 27, 535–543 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258974

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258974

Key Words

Navigation