Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of computed tomographic colonography to diagnose colorectal masses, stage colorectal cancers, image the proximal colon in obstructing colorectal lesions, and evaluate the anastomoses in patients with previous colorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively performed computed tomographic colonography examinations in 34 patients (20 males; mean age, 64.2; range, 19–91 years): 20 patients had colorectal masses (defined at endoscopy as intraluminal masses 2 cm or larger), 7 patients had benign obstructing colorectal strictures, and 7 patients had a prior colorectal resection. Final tumor staging was available in all 16 patients who had colorectal cancers and 15 patients were referred after incomplete colonoscopy. The ability of computed tomographic colonography to stage colorectal cancers, identify synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal masses, and image the proximal colon in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions was assessed. RESULTS: Computed tomographic colonography identified all colorectal masses, but overcalled two masses in patients who were either poorly distended or poorly prepared. Computed tomographic colonography correctly staged 13 of 16 colorectal cancers (81 percent) and detected 16 of 17 (93 percent) synchronous polyps. Computed tomographic colonography overstaged two Dukes Stage A cancers and understaged one Dukes Stage C cancer. A total of 97 percent (87/90) of all colonic segments were adequately visualized at computed tomographic colonography in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions compared with 60 percent (26/42) of segments at barium enema (P<0.01). Colonic anastomoses were visualized in all nine patients, but in one patient, computed tomographic colonography could not distinguish between local tumor recurrence and surgical changes. CONCLUSION: Computed tomographic colonography can accurately identify all colorectal masses but may overcall stool as masses in poorly distended or poorly prepared colons. Computed tomographic colonography has an overall staging accuracy of 81 percent for colorectal cancer and is superior to barium enema in visualizing colonic segments proximal to obstructing colorectal lesions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, Scharling ES, Grishaw EK, Shifrin RY. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:S104.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE,et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colonography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997;205:59–65.
Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Nunes DP, Ferrucci JT. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1237–42.
Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM,et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:989–95.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Harmsen WS. Computer tomographic colographic (virtual colonoscopy) for polyp detection: early comparison against barium enema. Gastroenterology 1997;112:A575.
Morrin M, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Endoluminal CT colonography utility after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:913–8.
Balthazar EJ, Siegel SE, Megibow AJ, Scholes J, Gordon R. CT in patients with scirrhous carcinoma of the GI tract: imaging findings and value for tumor detection and staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:839–45.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed FE,et al. Colorectal polyp detection, with CT colography (virtual colonoscopy): a blinded, prospective study. Radiology 1996;201:A252.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE,et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 1996;110:284–90.
Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT Colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;13:169–72.
Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone position. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:595–600.
Thoeni RF. Colorectal cancer: radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:457–85.
Harvey CJ, Amin Z, Hare CM,et al. Helical CT Pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1439–43.
Isbister WH, Al-Sanea O. Utility of pre-operative abdominal CT scanning in colorectal surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996;41:232–4.
Tate JJ, Rawlinson J, Royle JT, Brunton FJ, Taylor I. Pre-operative or post-operative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1988;75:1016–8.
Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997;336:8–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' 100th Anniversary and Tripartite Meeting, Washington D.C., May 1 to 6, 1999.
About this article
Cite this article
Morrin, M.M., Farrell, R.J., Raptopoulos, V. et al. Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 303–311 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258293