Skip to main content
Log in

Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum

A study using continuous ambulatory manometry

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Changes in anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectum (LAR) often lead to symptoms of urgency and frequency of defecation, the anterior resection syndrome. It has been reported that preservation of part of the rectum improves clinical results, but why this should be remains unclear. METHODS: We have carried out continuous ambulatory manometric studies in two groups of patients: 11 patients, a median of 11 (range, 5–96) months after LAR, in whom the median anastomotic level above the anal high-pressure zone was 0 (range, 0–2) cm; 9 patients, a median of 6 (range, 3–12) months after sigmoid colectomy, in whom the rectum remainedin situ and who acted as controls. RESULTS: Comparing the LAR group with controls, resting anal pressures were lower, median 68 (range 27-102) cm H2Ovs. 95 (45–116) cm H2O (P<0.05), and neorectal pressures were higher, 25 (0–48) cm H2Ovs. 10 (0–10) cm H2O (P<0.01). Thus the anorectal pressure gradients were less, 34 (0–74) cm H2Ovs. 81 (35–113) cm H2O (P<0.01). Slow-wave activity in the anal sphincter was present in six patients (55 percent) after coloanal anastomosis and eight patients (89 percent) after sigmoid colectomy. Sampling episodes were seen in only two patients (18 percent) after coloanal anastomosis and five patients (56 percent) after sigmoid colectomy. When clinical endpoints were compared (LARvs. controls), bowel frequency in 24 hours was higher, 5 (3–8)vs. 2 (1–3) (P<0.01); fecal leakage was more common, affecting seven patients (64 percent)vs. one patient (11 percent) (P<0.05), and urgency of defecation was also more common. CONCLUSIONS: The inferior clinical results observed after LAR compared with the results after sigmoid colectomy are thus in part because of higher neorectal pressure acting on a weakened sphincter mechanism. These observations lend support to the idea that neorectal capacity should be increased in patients who undergo low anterior resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson SM, Beahrs OH. The curative resection of carcinoma of the sigmoid, recto-sigmoid and rectum. Ann Surg 1976;183:556–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patient's survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pollert WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983;198:159–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson B, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of colo-anal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:1082–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly KA. State of the art address: anal sphincter saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 1992;163:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macfarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parks AG. Benign tumours of the rectum. In: Rob C, Smith R, Morgan CN, eds. Clinical surgery. Vol. 10. London: Butterworths, 1966:541.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on the function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980;67:203–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Molloy RG, Moran KT, Coulter J, Waldron R, Kirwan WO. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:462–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller R, Lewis GT, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Sensory discrimination and dynamic activity in the anorectum: evidence using a new ambulatory technique. Br J Surg 1988;75:1003–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith AN, Giannakos V, Clarke S. Late results of colomyotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1971;16:276–86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Imhof M, Bielecki K. Langsmyotomie als alternative zu herkommlichen pouch-verfahren nach proktocolektomie. Chirurg 1989;60:584–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Salter GV, King RF, Johnston D. Single lumen ileum with myectomy: an alternative to the pelvic reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990;77:1030–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:136–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986;73:138–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.

About this article

Cite this article

Williamson, M.E.R., Lewis, W.G., Holdsworth, P.J. et al. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 1228–1231 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257786

Key words

Navigation