Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal localization of a highly repeatedEcoRI DNA fragment inMegoura viciae (Homoptera, Aphididae) by nick translation and fluorescencein situ hybridization

  • Technical Viewpoint
  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the genome of the aphidMegoura viciae at molecular level, we have studied total DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis after cleavage with different restriction endonucleases.EcoRI digestion produced a highly repeated DNA fragment, about 600 bp long. The contribution of thisEcoRI element to the total genome ofM. viciae was estimated at about 6% by means of densitometric scanning of agarose gel photographs. The chromosomal localization of this fragment, investigated by fluorescentin situ hybridization (FISH), constantly showed one large and two narrower fluorescent bands located on the X chromosome, all corresponding to C-positive heterochromatic areas. These results are in full accordance with the data obtained byin situ nick translation experiments carried out afterEcoRI digestion, and clearly demonstrate that a substantial amount ofM. viciae heterochromatin consists ofEcoRI fragments which are mainly located on the X chromosome. Using theEcoRI restriction fragment as a molecular probe may prove to be a practical tool for the investigation of taxonomic and evolutionary relationships in this group of insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beye M, Moritz RFA (1995) Characterization of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) chromosomes using repetitive DNA probes and fluorochromein situ hybridization.J Heredity 86: 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, RL (1987) Reproduction, cytogenetics and development. In: Minsk AK, Harrewijn P, eds.Aphids: their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. A. Amsterdam: Elsevier pp 163–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder GD (1989) Morphological and biochemical effects of endonucleases on isolated mammalian chromosomesin vitro.Chromosoma 97: 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collet C, Westerman M (1984) Interspersed distribution patterns of C-bands and satellite DNA in the holocentric chromosomes ofLuzula flaccida (Juncaceae).Genetica 63: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis CA, Wyatt GR (1989) Distribution and sequence homogeneity of an abundant satellite DNA in the beetle,Tenebrio molitor.Nucleic Acids Res 17: 5579–5586.

    Google Scholar 

  • de La Torre J, Mitchell AR, Sumner AT (1991) Restriction endonuclease/nick translation of fixed mouse chromosomes: a study of factors affecting digestion of chromosomal DNAin situ.Chromosoma 100: 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • de La Torre J, Sumner AT, Gosalvez J, Stuppia L (1992) The distribution of genes on human chromosomes as studied byin situ nick translation.Genome 35: 890–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosalvez J, Lopez-Fernandez C, Ferrucci L, Mezzanotte R (1989) DNA base composition is not the only factor for restriction endonuclease activity on metaphase chromosomes: evidences using isoschizomers.Cytogenet Cell Genet 50: 142–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero P, de La Torre J, Arano B, Gosalvez J, Sumner AT (1995) Patterns of DNase sensitivity in the chromosomes ofRana perezi (Amphibia: Anura).Genome 38: 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Schrader S, Schrader F (1961) The kinetocore of the Hemiptera.Chromosoma 12: 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Miklos GLG (1979) Functional aspects of satellite DNA and heterochromatin.Int Rev Cytol 58: 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, Miklos GLG (1988)The Eukaryotic Genome in Development and Evolution. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagowsky JM, Yu M-YW, Forrest HS, Laird CD (1973) Dispersity of repeat DNA sequences inOncopeltus fasciatus, an organism with diffuse centromeres.Chromosoma 43: 349–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Gautam DC (1994) Cytogenetic investigations on the holocentric chromosomes ofTetraneurella akinire (Sasaki) (Homoptera, Pemphigidae).Caryologia 47: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Aloisi P et al. (1991a). New approaches to the study of aphid chromosomes. Proceedings of the 4th European Congress of Entomology, Vol. 1, Godollo, Hungary, September 1–6, 1991. Budapest: Hungarian Natural History Museum, pp 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Bonvicini Pagliai AM, Bianchi U (1991b) Characterization ofAcyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Homoptera: Aphididae) karyotype using G and C banding. Proceedings of the XVI Italian Congress of Entomology, Bari/Martina Franca, Italy, September 23–28, 1991. Bari: Industria Grafica Laterza, pp 513–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Gautam DC, Bizzaro D et al. (1991c) Chromosome banding in Aphids: G, C,AluI, andHaeIII banding patterns inMegoura viciae (Homoptera, Aphididae)Genome 34: 661–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Azzoni P, Bianchi U (1994) Cytological and electrophoretic analysis of DNA methylation in the holocentric chromosomes ofMegoura viciae (Homoptera, Aphididae)Genome 37: 625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Galli E, Bianchi U (1996) Heterochromatin heterogeneity in the holocentric X chromatin ofMegoura viciae (Homoptera, Aphididae).Genome (in press).

  • Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L, Vanni R, Sumner AT (1985) Some factors affecting the action of restriction endonucleases on human metaphase chromosomes.Exp Cell Res 161: 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R, Rossino R, Nieddu M, Lopez-Fernandez C, Gosalvez J (1992) The DNA fragments produced byAluI andBstNI digestion of fixed mouse chromosomes.Chromosoma 101: 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignone D, Galasso I, Rossino R, Mezzanotte R (1995) Characterization ofDasypyrum villosum (L.) Candargy chromosomal chromatin by means ofin situ restriction endonucleases, fluorochromes, silver staining and C-banding.Chromosome Res 3: 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MF (1982) Highly repeated sequences in mammalian genomes.Int Rev Cytol 76: 67–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin.Exp Cell Res 75: 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT, Taggart MH, Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L (1990) Patterns of digestion of human chromosomes by restriction endonucleases demonstrated byin situ nick translation.Histochem J 22: 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugarkovic D, Plhol M, Petitpierre E, Lucijanic-Justic V, Juan C (1994)Tenebrio obscurus satellite DNA is resistant to cleavage by restriction endonucleasein situ.Chromosome Res 2: 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Carlo Manicardi.

Additional information

accepted for publication by J. S. (Pat) Heslop-Harrison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bizzaro, D., Manicardi, G.C. & Bianchi, U. Chromosomal localization of a highly repeatedEcoRI DNA fragment inMegoura viciae (Homoptera, Aphididae) by nick translation and fluorescencein situ hybridization. Chromosome Res 4, 392–396 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257275

Key words

Navigation