Skip to main content
Log in

Current status of domestic telemedicine

  • Telemedicine Status/Over View
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript addresses several aspects of the current status of telemedicine in the United States. Telemedicine programs have been in existence since the 1960s, but only in the last 2 or 3 years have they begun to proliferate. Teleradiology has grown rapidly, both in the number of systems and the volume of images transmitted. Clinical telemedicine consultation, using video-conferencing, has seen an increase in the number of programs, but patient volumes remain low. In this paper, I discuss the scope and effectiveness of telemedicine, the kinds of applications in use at various telemedicine centers, and issues of importance in the development and integration of telemedicine systems into the health care delivery infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menolascino, F.J., and Osborne, R.G., Psychiatric television consultation for the mentally retarded.Am. J. Psychiat. 127:157–162, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wittson, C.L., and Benschoter, R., Two-way television: Helping the medical center reach out.Am. J. Psychiat. 129:136–139, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dwyer, T.F., Telepsychiatry: Psychiatric consultation by interactive television.Am. J. Psych., 130:865–869, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, P.A., Youssef, Z.I., and Bashshur, R.L., Telemedicine in the United States: A summary of operational programs.Telemedicine: Explorations in the Use of Telecommunications in Health Care (R.L. Bashshur, P.A. Armstrong, and Z.I. Youssef, eds.), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill, 1975, pp. 309–346.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Justice, J.W., and Decker, P.G., Telemedicine in a rural health delivery system.Adv. Biomed. Eng. 7:101–171, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lovett, J.E., and Bashshur, R.L., Telemedicine in the USA: An overview.Telecommun. Pol. 3–14, March 1979.

  7. Grigsby, J., Kaehny, M.M., Schlenker, R.E., Shaughnessy, P.W. and Beale, S.K.,Analysis of Expansion of Access to Care Through Use of Telemedicine and Mobile Health Services. Report 1: Literature Review and Analytic Framework, Center for Health Policy Research, Denver, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paakkala, T., Aalto, J., Kähärä, V., Seppänen, S., Diagnostic performance of a teleradiology system in primary health care.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 36:157–160, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kagetsu, N.J., Zulauf, D.R.P., and Ablow R.C., Clinical trial of digital teleradiology in the practice of emergency room medicine.Radiology 165:551–554, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, G.G., Cook, L.T., McMillan, J.H., Rosenthal, S.J., and Dwyer, S.J., III, Chest radiography: Comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.Radiology 176:771–776, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, W.W., Jr., Rosenbaum, J.E., Ackerman, S.J., Reichle, R.L., Magid, D., Weller, J.C. and Gitlin, J.N., Subtle orthopedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation.Radiology 187: 811–815, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eide, T.J., and Nordrum, I., Frozen section service via the telenetwork in northern Norway.Zentralbl. Path. 138:409–412, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eide, T.J., Nordrum, I., and Stalsberg, H., The validity of frozen section diagnosis based on video-microscopy.Zentralbl. Pathol. 138:405–407, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein, R.S., Bloom, K.J., and Rozek, L.S., Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services.Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 111:646–652, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein, R.S., Telepathology comes of age in Norway.Hum. Pathol. 22:511–513, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattioli, L., Goertz, K., Ardinger, R., Belmont, J., Cox, R., and Thomas, C., Pediatric cardiology: Auscultation from 280 miles away.Kansas Med. 93: 326–350, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy, R.L.H, Block, P., Bird, K.T. and Yurchak, P., Accuracy of cardiac auscultation by microwave.Chest 63:578–581, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hubble, J.P., Pahwa, R., Michalek, D.K., Thomas, C., and Koller, W.C., Interactive video conferencing: A means of providing interim care to Parkinson's Disease patients.Movement Dis. 8:380–382, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobczyk, W.L., Solinger, R.E., Rees, A.H., and Elbl, F., Transtelephonic echocardiography: Successful use in a tertiary pediatric referral center.J. Pediatr. 122:S84-S88, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Preston, J., Brown, F.W., and Hartley,B., Using telemedicine to improve health care in distant areas.Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 43:25–32, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Allen, A., Editor's note.Telemed. Newslett. 1(4):1–3, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grigsby, J., Sandberg, E.J., Kaehny, M.M., Kramer, A.M., Schlenker, R.E., and Shaughnessy, P.W.,Analysis of Expansion of Access to Care Through Use of Telemedicine and Mobile Health Services. Report 2: Case Studies and Current Status of Telemedicine, Center for Health Policy Research, Denver.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grigsby, J. Current status of domestic telemedicine. J Med Syst 19, 19–27 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257187

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257187

Keywords

Navigation