Abstract
The effects of both single and repeated doses of theophylline were evaluated on a battery of nine performance tests, the EEG, the EMG and on subjective assessments of mood and side-effects. The subjects were 20 healthy adults who participated in both phases of this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. The single dose of 400 mg and the repeated doses of 300 mg b.d. for 4 weeks were intended to attain therapeutic serum concentrations. The Sternberg Additive Factors Method for assessing information processing revealed enhanced performance in both phases of this study, while the Horizontal Addition Test showed improved performance in the single dose phase only. The remaining seven performance tests failed to show significant differences between theophylline and placebo. Single doses of theophylline did not significantly alter mood, but marked adverse effects were encountered in the repeated dose phase, possibly related to unpleasant side-effects. Both EEG and EMG findings indicative of stimulation were associated with a single dose of theophylline, but substantial tolerance developed during 4 weeks of therapy. These findings demonstrate CNS stimulation by both single and repeated doses of theophylline with the occurrence of adverse side-effects during repeated administrations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartel P, Lotz B, Delport R, Ubbink J, Becker P (1989) Electrophysiological indices of central and peripheral nervous system function during theophylline therapy. Neuropsychobiology 21:104–108
Bättig K, Buzzi R (1986) Effect of coffee on the speed of subject-paced information processing. Neuropsychobiology 16:126–130
Bruce M, Scott N, Lader M, Marks V (1986) The psychopharmacological and electrophysiological effects of single doses of caffeine in healthy human subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22:81–87
Bukowskyj M, Nakatsu K, Munt PW (1984) Theophylline reassessed. Ann Intern Med 101:63–73
Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 127–131
Coffin VL, Spealman RD (1989) Psychomotor-stimulant effects of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine: comparison with caffeine and 7-(2-chloroethyl) theophylline. Eur J Pharmacol 170:35–40
Curatolo PW, Robertson D (1983) The health consequences of caffeine. Ann Intern Med 98:641–653
Deuschl G, Strahl K, Schenck E, Lücking CH (1988) The diagnostic significance of long-latency reflexes in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70:56–61
Elkins RN, Rapoport JL, Zahn TP, Buchsbaum MS, Weingartner H, Kopin IJ, Langer D, Johnson C (1981) Acute effects of caffeine in normal prepubertal boys. Am J Psychiatry 138:178–183
Gottstein U, Held K, Sebening H, Steiner K (1971/72) Is decrease of cerebral blood flow after intravenous injections of theophylline due to direct vasoconstrictive action of the drug? Eur Neurol 6:153–157
Hendeles L, Weinberger M (1983) Improved efficacy and safety of theophylline in the control of airways hyperreactivity. Pharmacol Ther 18:91–105
Kennedy RS, Odenheimer RC, Baltzley DR, Dunlap WP, Wood CD (1990) Differential effects of scopolamine and amphetamine on microcomputer-based performance tests. Aviat Space Environ Med 61:615–621
Kuznicki JT, Turner LS (1986) The effects of caffeine on caffeine users and non-users. Physiol Behav 37:397–408
Leathwood PD, Pollet P (1982/83) Diet-induced mood changes in normal populations. J Psychiatr Res 17:147–154
Letz R, Baker EL (1988) NES2 Neurobehavioral Evaluation System. Neurobehavioral Systems, Winchester, MD, pp 20–37
Lezak MD (1983) Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 253–559
Lieberman HR, Wurtman RJ, Emde GG, Roberts C, Coviella ILG (1987) The effects of low doses of caffeine on human performance and mood. Psychopharmacology 92:308–312
Loke WH, Meliska CJ (1984) Effects of caffeine use and ingestion on a protracted visual vigilance task. Psychopharmacology 84:54–57
Matejcek M, Irwin P, Neff G, Abt K, Wehrli W (1985) Determination of the central effects of the asthma prophylactic ketotifen, the bronchodilator theophylline, and both in combination: An application of quantitative electroencephalography to the study of drug interactions. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 23:258–266
Oborne DJ, Rogers Y (1983) Interactions of alcohol and caffeine on human reaction time. Aviat Space Environ Med 54:528–534
Pollock VE, Teasdale T, Stern J, Volavka J (1981) Effects of caffeine on resting EEG and response to sine wave modulated light. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 51:470–476
Rachelefsky GS, Wo J, Adelson J, Mickey MR, Spector SL, Katz RM, Siegel SC, Rohr AS (1986) Behavior abnormalities and poor school performance due to oral theopylline use. Pediatrics 78:1133–1138
Snyder SH, Sklar P (1984) Behavioral and molecular actions of caffeine: Focus on adenosine. J Psychiatr Res 18:91–106
Stern KN, Chait LD, Johanson CE (1989) Reinforcing and subjective effects of caffeine in normal human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 98:81–88
Sternberg S (1967) Two operations in character recognition: some evidence from reaction-time measurements. Percept Psychophys 2:45–53
Sternberg S (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychol 30:276–315
Swift CG, Tiplady B (1988) The effects of age on the response to caffeine. Psychopharmacology 94:29–31
Tiplady B, Fagan D, Lamont M, Brockway M, Scott DB (1990) A comparison of the CNS effects of enprofylline and theophylline in healthy subjects assessed by performance testing and subjective measures. Br J Clin Pharmacol 30:55–61
Yu G, Maskrey V, Jackson SHD, Tiplady B, Swift CG (1990) A comparison of the CNS effects of caffeine and theophylline in elderly subjects. J Psychopharmacol 4:276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartel, P., Delport, R., Lotz, B. et al. Effects of single and repeated doses of theophylline on aspects of performance, electrophysiology and subjective assessments in healthy human subjects. Psychopharmacology 106, 90–96 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02253594
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02253594